I have read that the D'Alembertian for a scalar field is ◻=gνμ∇ν∇μ=1√−g∂μ(√−g∂μ).
Exactly when is this correct? Only for ◻ϕ where ϕ is a scalar-field?
How exactly is it shown?
Is it true only on-shell, from the Euler-Lagrange equations of a scalar-field?
Answer
This is based on the observation that, given some vector Vμ,
∇μVμ=1√−g∂μ(√−gVμ)
We can show explicitly that this is true:
∇μVμ=∂μVμ+ΓμμλVλ
Let's examine the last term:
Γμμλ=12gμρ(∂μgλρ+∂λgμρ−∂ρgλμ) we can cancel the first and third term on the right hand side, yielding Γμμλ=12gμρ∂λgμρ
The idea is to show that this equals 1√−g∂λ√−g:
∂λ√−g=−12√−g∂λg=−12√−g|gμν+δgμν|−|gμν|δxλ=−12√−g|gμν||I+(gμν)−1∂λgμνδxλ|−|gμν|δxλ=−12√−g|gμν|(1+Tr((gμν)−1∂λgμνδxλ))−|gμν|δxλ=√−g12(gμν∂λgμν) Here, I used |gμν| to denote the determinant of gμν. Multiplying by 1√−g and comparing shows that Γμμλ=1√−g∂λ√−g=∂λln√−g It follows that ∇μVμ=1√−g∂μ(√−gVμ) Thus, you see that your formula of the d'Alembertian holds only for scalars: the first covariant derivative reduces to a partial derivative, and for ∂μϕ we appeal to the formula I derived. Note, however, that we never used the equations of motion. This is all just a much longer and more explicit version of what Qmechanic already posted while I was typing this up.
No comments:
Post a Comment