Thursday, 14 February 2019

condensed matter - Number of Goldstone Modes in the Heisenberg Model?


I am getting confused about the number of Goldstone modes present in the Heisenberg model. After a Holstein-Primakoff transformation the energy can be written a: H=JS2Nz+kε(k)a(k)a(k)+higher order terms

where a(k) and a(k) are Bosonic creation and annihilation operators and: ε(k)=2JS(3cos(kxa)cos(kya)cos(kza))
To me this indicates 3 independent Goldstone modes. But I have also read that we should have one Goldstone mode per continuous symmetry generator broken - from this I would expect 2 Goldstone modes. This answer on a related question also indicates that the Heisenberg model is an exception.


My question is therefore: How many Goldstone modes does the Heisenberg model have and why?



Answer



Having a Goldstone mode at momentum k=(kx,ky,kz) requires that the energy vanishes there, i.e. ε(k)=0. In the periodic Brillouin zone [πa,πa]×[πa,πa]×[πa,πa], this only happens at the zone center, k=(0,0,0). More precisely, for small momenta, we have that ε(k)JSa2(k2x+k2y+k2z).


So we seemingly have only one Goldstone mode. How does this rhyme with the number of Goldstone modes being equal to the number of broken symmetry-generators (which is indeed two in this case)?



The answer that the above rule of thumb for counting Goldstone modes is true for relativistic theories, where the Goldstone modes have a low-energy dispersion ε|k|. However, in the above case, our low-energy dispersion is quadratic. Indeed, the more general formula is given in this 1976 article "On how to count Goldstone bosons" by Nielsen and Chadha: the modes where εk|k|z count double if z is even. Hence, #(broken generators)=#(Goldstone modes with z odd)+2#(Goldstone modes with z even).


Example: the ferromagnetic Heisenberg model has one Goldstone mode with a quadratic dispersion, whereas the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model has two Goldstone modes with a linear dispersion. In both cases, this agrees with the number of broken generators being two.


No comments:

Post a Comment