Take a globally hyperbolic topologically trivial spacetime M≅R×Σ, Σ≅R(n−1). Given p,q∈M, such that there exists a future-directed null geodesic ℓ between p and q, is this equivalent to the condition that p↗q, an horismos relation (q is on p's lightcone), ie p≤q and p≪̸?
This is fairly obviously not true for say, totally vicious spacetimes, where p \ll p for all points, ie every point has a closed timelike curve (there isn't even any horismos to be on), and for a globally hyperbolic example, the Minkowski cylinder \Sigma = S, where a null geodesic will connect to a point in p's own lightcone after one turn. On the other hand, this is certainly true of Minkowski space, as well as any spacetime related to it by a Weyl transform.
This would be equivalent to proving that, if q \in I^+(p), then there is no null geodesics linking p to q which, given the properties of globally hyperbolic spacetimes, means that there is a maximizing timelike geodesic linking the two points. If q = \exp_p(v) for some v, this would be correct (since \exp_p I^+(0, \mathbb{R}^n) = I^+(p, M)), but that would be assuming that \text{Im}(\exp_p) = M for such a spacetime, which I am not sure is correct even for such a benign example.
Is such a thing true and if so how to show it?
Answer
This is not true in general. As an example take a spherically symmetric (regular) ultracompact object's spacetime. That is, an spherical symmetric object that is compact enough to fit inside its own lightring, but without a horizon. The upshot is that we end up with a spacetime that is Schwarzschild outside some radius smaller than the lightring, and has some regular matter filled region inside such that the spacetime remains topologically trivial.
Expressed in Schwarzshild coordinates, a line with constant spacial coordinates on the lightring radius will be timelike. It is immediately clear that there are pairs of points on this line that are also connected by a null geodesic going around the lightring.
No comments:
Post a Comment