I have this doubt:
Imagine two operators A and B and the state ψ.
I know that the following statement is true:
⟨ψ|A|ψ⟩∗=⟨ψ|A†|ψ⟩
But is it correct to write: ⟨ψ|AB|ψ⟩∗=⟨ψ|B†A†|ψ⟩=⟨ψ|B†A†ψ⟩?
This doubt came to me, because I was doing some execises and applied this identity. I found out that what I reached was wrong. I tried to find the error and only this came to my head.
Dirac notation is ill-suited for non-self-adjoint operators. Here's why:
Let (−,−) be the inner product on our Hilbert space. The expectation value of AB is then ⟨AB⟩ψ=(ψ,ABψ)
by definition, and Dirac notation writes
⟨ψ|AB|ψ⟩. for this. But, in this notation, it is no longer clear to which side the operator
AB acts - one could as well interpret this expression as meaning
(BAψ,ψ), which is not the same if
A,B are not self-adjoint. So, by
⟨ψ|A|ψ⟩∗=⟨ψ|A†|ψ⟩
you really mean
(ψ,Aψ)∗=(Aψ,ψ)=(ψ,A†ψ)
where the last equality is by
definition of the adjoint.
So, examining the expression with AB, we find (ψ,ABψ)∗=(ABψ,ψ)=(ψ,(AB)†ψ)=(ψ,B†A†ψ)
and thus
⟨ψ|AB|ψ⟩∗=⟨ψ|B†A†|ψ⟩
if all operators are interpreted as acting on the states to their right. However, since this is
not usually understood - for self-adjoint operators it doesn't matter, and many texts freely switch the direction of the action of the operators whenever convenient - you should refrain from using Dirac notation for operators which are not self-adjoint.
No comments:
Post a Comment