- It would be great if someone can give me a reference (short enough!) which explains the (spinor) representation theory of the groups SO(n,1) and SO(n,2).
I have searched through a few standard representation theory books and I couldn't find any.
- More specifically I would like to know how a Lorentz spinor of SO(n−1,1) (say Q) is "completed" to a conformal spinor of SO(n,2) (say V) by saying,
V=(Q,CˉS)
where C is a "charge conjugation operator" and S is probably another SO(n−1,1) spinor.
Is there some natural Clifford algebra representation (Γ) lurking around here with respect to which I can define the "charge conjugation operator" as C such that C−1ΓC=−ΓT? (...in general a representation of the Clifford algebra also gives a representation of SO(n,1)..I would like to know as to how this general idea might be working here...)
Some of the other aspects of this group theory that I want to know are an explanation for facts like,
- Sp(4) is the same as SO(3,2), and the fundamental of Sp(4) is the spinor of SO(3,2)
- SU(2,2) is the same as SO(4,2), and the fundamental of SU(2,2) is the spinor of SO(4,2)
(...just two "facts" hoping that people can point me to some literature (hopefully short!) which explains the systematics of which the above are probably two examples...)
No comments:
Post a Comment