Tuesday 1 October 2019

Does quantum reversibility require many worlds?


The source S sends a photon into the beam splitter below. There is a 50% chance that it will be detected at A and a 50% chance it will be detected at B.


S -----------\---------> A
|
|
|

v
B

Now if we assume that physics is (generally) reversible we should be able to time-reverse this process. This would imply that if we send in a photon at A or B it should always appear back at S.


How can this happen? We know that if we send in a photon at A (or B) we would expect it to appear 50% of the time at S and 50% at C as below.


             C                                         C
^ ^
| |
| |
| |

S <----------\--------- A S <------------\
|
|
|
B

In order that the photon always appears back at S and never at C we need a superposition of the two situations above such that the paths to S constructively interfere and the paths to C destructively interfere.


Thus it seems that in order to retain time-reversibility we need to assume a many-worlds view. As a photon is sent in at A (or B) it must be assumed that another photon is simultaneously sent in at B (or A) and both states weighted with the correct amplitude such that a photon appears with certainty back at S.


What do people think?




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...