One of the steps when learning quantum mechanics in three dimensions is to normalize ψ in a cubic box of side a. In math terms a∫0a∫0a∫0ψ∗ψdxdydz=1,
Now, to me these boundary conditions simply mean that at a the wavelength must be zero. It can be "after" a full length or a half length. My question is, why can't there be a half integer (say 2,5; 4,5) number of wave lengths in any of the box dimensions?
Answer
Now, to me these boundary conditions simply mean that at a the wavelength must be zero. It can be "after" a full length or a half length. My question is, why can't there be a half integer (say 2,5; 4,5) number of wave lengths in any of the box dimensions?
You really need to solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation for that:
[−ℏ22m∇2+V(x,y,z)]ψ(x,y,z)=Eψ(x,y,z)
For a single particle in a cubic, zero potential well (V(x,y,z)=0) with infinitely high potential walls:
−ℏ22m∇2ψ(x,y,z)=Eψ
Reworked:
ψxx+ψyy+ψzz+k2ψ=0
Where k2=2mEℏ2.
Solve by variable separation(∗), with Ansatz ψ(x,y,z)=X(x)Y(y)Z(z) that gives three ODEs of which the first is:
X″(x)+k2xX(x)=0
⟹X(x)=c1cos(kxx)+c2sin(kxx)
With X(0)=0⟹c1=0
X(x)=c2sin(kxx)
For nx=1, a is half a wave length, for nx=2, a is a whole wave length, for nx=3, a is one and a half wave lengths, etc.
The two other ODEs for Y(y) and Z(z) are obtained and solved analogously, obtaining ny and nz as quantum numbers.
The integration constants c2 are obtained by normalising each equation separately, e.g.:
∫a0X2(x)dx=1⟹c22∫a0(sin2kxx)dx=1
c2=√2a
That's allowed because: ∫a0∫a0∫a0[X(x)Y(y)Z(z)]2dxdydz=∫a0X2(x)dx×∫a0Y2(y)dy×∫a0Z2(z)dz
The Normalised wave function is then:
ψ(x,y,z)=(√2a)3sin(nxπxa)sin(nyπya)sin(nzπza)
The quantised energy levels are obtained by inserting the wave function into the PDE, this gives:
k2=k2x+k2y+k2z
2mEℏ2=π2a2(n2x+n2y+n2z)
(∗) Insert Ansatz into PDE: YZX″+XZY″+XYZ″+k2XYZ=0
X″X=−Y″Y−Z″Z−k2=−k2x
No comments:
Post a Comment