While analysing a problem in quantum Mechanics, I realized that I don't fully understand the physical meanings of certain integrals. I have been interpreting:
∫ϕ†ˆAψdx as "(square root of) probability that a particle with state |ψ⟩ will collapse to a state |ϕ⟩ when one tries to observe the observable corresponding to ˆA"
∫ϕ†ψdx as "(square root of) probability that a particle with state |ψ⟩ will collapse to a state |ϕ⟩".
All integrals are over all space here, and all ϕs and ψs are normalized.
Now, I realize that interpretation of the first integral doesn't really make sense when put side by side with the second one.
For example, when |ϕ⟩ is an eigenstate of ˆA, I get two different expressions for "the square root of probability that one will get the corresponding eigenvalue of ψ when one tries to observe the observable corresponding to ˆA". As far as I can tell, ∫ϕ†ˆAψdx≠∫ϕ†ψdx, even if |ϕ⟩ is an eigenstate of ˆA. I am inclined to believe that the second integral is the correct answer here (it comes naturally when you split |ψ⟩ into a linear combination of basis vectors). But I am at a loss as to the interpretation of the first integral.
So, my question is, what are the physical interpretations of ∫ϕ†ˆAψdx and ∫ϕ†ψdx?
(While I am familiar with the bra-ket notation, I have not used it in this question as I don't want to confuse myself further. Feel free to use it in your answer, though)
Answer
I'll start with the second one. ∫ϕ∗ψdx is, as Chris says in the comments, the scalar (or dot) product of ϕ and ψ. In the Dirac notation, it is written as ⟨ϕ|ψ⟩ and it gives the overlap of the two wavefunctions. In other words, it gives the probability amplitude (i.e., what you call square root of probability) that starting from |ψ⟩ we will measure the state to be |ϕ⟩.
The first integral works in pretty much the same way; it's just the scalar product of |ϕ⟩ with ˆA|ψ⟩. This means that you first apply ˆA to the state |ψ⟩ and then measure its overlap with |ϕ⟩. But this is not the same as calculating the amplitude probability of measuring |ϕ⟩ after the measurement of ˆA is performed on |ψ⟩. If you measured ˆA, that would be described by a set of projectors ˆΠi=|χi⟩⟨χi|, where |χi⟩ is an eigenvector of ˆA. The state |ψ⟩ collapses to |χi⟩ with probability pi=|⟨χi|ψ⟩|2 which then collapses to |ϕ⟩ with probability qi=|⟨ϕ|χi⟩|2. The overall probability is then P=∑ipiqi, which is not the same as |⟨ϕ|ˆA|ψ⟩|2, as you can see if you write ˆA|ψ⟩=∑iχi|χi⟩⟨χi|ψ⟩, with χi being the eigenvalues of ˆA.
Edit:
The interpretation of ˆA|ψ⟩ can be divided into several cases:
If ˆA is unitary, ˆA|ψ⟩ can be understood as a time evolution of |ψ⟩ governed by a Hamiltonian ˆH fulfilling ˆA=exp(iˆHt).
If ˆA is not unitary, but is trace-decreasing (i.e., ⟨ψ|ˆA†ˆA|ψ⟩≤⟨ψ|ψ⟩ for each |ψ⟩) it can describe some probabilistic evolution |ψ⟩→|φi⟩ with probability pi≤1.
The general case cannot be, I believe, interpreted generally. It requires renormalization (as does case 2) but this time the norm cannot be interpreted as the probability. Thus, it depends on the specific operator used.
As daaxix pointed out in the comments, the expression ⟨ϕ|ˆA|ψ⟩ can be understood as a form of generalized mean value. Assuming ˆA is Hermitian and writing |ψ⟩=∑kck|χk⟩, |ϕ⟩=∑kdk|χk⟩, we have ⟨ϕ|ˆA|ψ⟩=∑k,lckd∗l⟨χl|ˆA|χk⟩.
No comments:
Post a Comment