In a circular one, it would lose energy due to bremsstrahlung (synchrotron emission), but if it is accelerated from rest to ~GeV energies, does it lose any energy in this acceleration process?
Answer
According to Larmors' formula in Lorentz invariant form the power loss P of a accelerated particle is given by (cgs-units are used, e is the electron charge, c speed of light, m0 the rest mass of the electron):
P=−23e2c(m0c2)2[dpμdτdpμdτ]
where τ is the proper time, and pμ=(E/c,→p) are the 4 components of the 4-momentum (E is the energy of the electron and →p its 3-momentum). If the 4-momentum change rate is written out in its components we get:
P=23e2c(m0c2)2[(d→pdτ)2−1c2(dEdτ)2]
Using dEdτ=vdpdt and replacing the proper time of the particle by the observer time t by dτ=1γdt gives ( 1γ=√1−β2 with β=vc):
P=23e2cγ2(m0c2)2[(d→pdt)2−v2c2(dpdt)2](∗)
In case of a linear acceleration we can set →p=p⋅→ep where p is the length of the momentum vector and →ep its time-independent (!) unit direction vector (d→epdt=0). Then we get:
P=23e2c(m0c2)2[γ2(1−β2)(dpdt)2]
The term γ2(1−β2)=1.
The parameter which in linear accelerators measures the acceleration typically is the energy gain per length, i.e. (dEdx) which is equal to: dEdx=dpdt. With this in mind we get:
P=23e2c(m0c2)2(dEdx)2
The energy gain per meter in a typical linear accelerator is 15MeV/m, with this value one gets a radiation power in order of 10−17W (changing the formula to SI-units). So the answer is: Yes, principally there is energy loss in a linear accelerator, but it is so small, that it can be neglected right away.
In the opposite case one is only interested in the radiation on a circular path, term dpdt can be set to zero in formula (*), as the length of the momentum vector does not change. However we can use:
(d→pdt)2=→F2=(m⋅a)2=(mv2R)2
where for a the centripetal acceleration a=v2R was used.
If however the centripetal acceleration is plugged in we will finally get the well-known formula for the radiation power in a circular accelerator which is tremendously much larger than in case of the linear accelerator.
No comments:
Post a Comment