Monday, 10 July 2017

thermodynamics - I don't understand why a cavity with a hole is a black body



It makes no sense to me that a cavity with a hole is identical to a black body.


Sure, the cavity will probably be a near perfect absorber, but I don’t see how it will be a perfect emitter as well.



Why exactly does a cavity with a hole behave like a black body? Why can I make such a contraption and simulate and skip considerations of a special chemical makeup that has to occur in a black body?


Another thing that bothers me is that these cavities are not “absorbing” light, they are simply hogging it and letting it bounce inside.


Also, on the typical graphs where intensity is graphed against frequency (or wavelength): this isn’t really intensity, right? I have to integrate this curve in order to get useful information, right?


Some call it the spectral energy density. Is the integral under the curve then the energy density inside the cavity (as in, $J/m^3$)?



Answer



I will address this part of the question:



Why exactly does a cavity with a hole behave like a black body? Why can I make such a contraption and simulate and skip considerations of a special chemical makeup that has to occur in a blackbody?



One starts with a black body, absorbing all radiation and emitting it in thermodynamic equilibrium with the environment.



One should go to the original thought processes about black body radiation and the experimental discrepancy between the calculations with the classical electromagnetic theory that was the only one known at the time:


bbradiation



As the temperature decreases, the peak of the black-body radiation curve moves to lower intensities and longer wavelengths. The black-body radiation graph is also compared with the classical model of Rayleigh and Jeans.



This prediction is the the divergent line in the plot. How was it arrived at



"Blackbody radiation" or "cavity radiation" refers to an object or system which absorbs all radiation incident upon it and re-radiates energy which is characteristic of this radiating system only, not dependent upon the type of radiation which is incident upon it. The radiated energy can be considered to be produced by standing wave or resonant modes of the cavity which is radiating.



The cavity was a reasonable way to model mathematically the electromagnetic field for the radiation observed/measured from all bodies, it simplifies the mathematics, and the small hole allows for the radiation to come out and be measured. It should have the same spectrum as the one radiated from any part of the body. For thermodynamic considerations it makes no difference if the body is hollow or not. Equilibrium is equilibrium and should exist outside and inside. A small hole is the probe of what is happening inside.



In the classical model



A mode for an electromagnetic wave in a cavity must satisfy the condition of zero electric field at the wall. If the mode is of shorter wavelength, there are more ways you can fit it into the cavity to meet that condition. Careful analysis by Rayleigh and Jeans showed that the number of modes was proportional to the frequency squared.



classical bb



From the assumption that the electromagnetic modes in a cavity were quantized in energy with the quantum energy equal to Planck's constant times the frequency, Planck derived a radiation formula.



Planck's radiation formula fitted the experimental curves and showed that the interactions of the waves with the walls of the cavity (the way thermodynamic equilibrium is reached) were quantized and the probability of interaction had to fall for higher frequencies and thus the ultraviolet catastrophy was avoided.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...