Friday, 14 September 2018

electromagnetism - Why does charge accumulate at points?


This is a very trivial question, but I can't seem to reason it out, again, as to why charges gather at points and edges.



Answer



I think, on would need a model to understand how it works in principle. enter image description here


Let us consider the simplified system represented on the figure. You have two metallic spheres with radii $R_1$ and $R_2$ respectively.



They are linked via a metallic wire as well.


Because all these guys constitute a single metallic object, they must have the same potential that I noted $V$.


Let us assume for simplicity that the charges are uniformly distributed on the two spheres with two different surface charge densities $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$.


Now, that the stage is set, there are two competing effects which have opposite influence on the increase of the charge density:




  • The charge on a metallic object, in the linear regime, is proportional to its potential which is denoted by $Q = CV$ where $C$ is the capacitance. The capacitance is such that, for simple convex shapes, it increase with the system size such that for a sphere $C \propto R$. From this, we can assert that $\frac{Q_1}{Q_2} = \frac{R_1}{R_2}$. Hence the total charge carried by sphere 1 is bigger than that of sphere 2.




  • There is a second effect (which is a simple one) that consists in noticing that the charge density is inversely proportional to the square of the size of the object essentially $\sigma \sim R^{-2} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi R^2}$ for a sphere. Hence $\frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_2}=\frac{Q_1}{Q_2}\frac{R_2^2}{R_1^2}$





Overall, we finally get that $\frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_2}=\frac{R_2}{R_1}$ and hence "points" have a larger charge density than bigger objects.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...