In this question the state, 1√3|00⟩+1√3|01⟩+1√3|11⟩, has been said in the answers to not be able to collapse into 12|11⟩⟨11|+12|00⟩⟨00| after measuring a |0⟩ in the first qubit because this would break "rotational invariance".
I understand mathematically that we project the state into |0⟩⟨0|⊗11 and it becomes |0⟩⊗(|0⟩+|1⟩)/√2.
(Phrasing the question in a way suggested by the comments:) If I consider the situation in which a measurement the 1st qubit in the 0,1 basis causes the second qubit to collapses in the 0,1 basis - why would this break rotational invariance? (And is this method of evauluation a useful way of investigating measuring qubits in general?)
Answer
Let's say we are using the -- incorrect -- rule that upon measuring the first qubit in the {|0⟩,|1⟩} basis and obtaining the |0⟩ outcome, the second qubit collapses in the {|0⟩,|1⟩} basis, i.e. on |00⟩ and |01⟩.
Our test state is |Ψ⟩=1√3|00⟩+1√3|01⟩+1√3|11⟩ .
Thus, this scheme is not invariant under a basis transformation of the B system -- depending in which basis I express my B system (this is what the Hadamard does), I get different results. So if you want a measurement scheme which gives the same result independent of the basis you choose for B, the proposed scheme does not work.
No comments:
Post a Comment