Friday, 11 September 2020

quantum field theory - Definition and difference between the R-symmetry and the $U(1)_R$ internal symmetry



  • For a general ${\cal N}$ the R-symmetry group is $U({\cal N})$ but for the ${\cal N}=2$ case why is it $SU(2)$ ? I guess it is again different for ${\cal N}=4$. How does one understand this?



One denotes the generators of the R-symmetry group by $B^i$ and let $\alpha$ be the spinor index and let $a,b$ be the R-charge indices in a ${\cal N}=2$ theory. Then one writes the defining equations as,


$[Q_{\alpha a}, B^i] = -\frac{1}{2} (\tau ^i)_a ^b Q_{\alpha b}$ and $[\bar{Q}_{\dot{\alpha}}^a, B^i] = \frac{1}{2} \bar{Q}_{\dot{\alpha}}^b (\tau ^i)_b ^a$



  • But it is not clear to me as to why over and above the aforementioned equations there should be yet another charge $R$ (called the $U(1)_R$ charge) with the defining equations,


$[Q_{\alpha a},R] = Q_{\alpha a}$ and $[\bar{Q}_{\dot{\alpha} a}, R] = - \bar{Q}_{\dot{\alpha} a}$


I would like to know why the above charge should exist in ${\cal N}=2$ supersymetry separate from the R-symmetry.


Is there an analogue for this $R$ for other values of ${\cal N}$ ?



  • Typically this R-charge as defined above is anomalous. How does one see that? Also what is the analogous statement for R-symmetry?





No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...