On page 303 in Peskin&Schroeder they give the vertex factor as
V=−ieγμ∫d4x
while on page 304 they write
V×=−ieγμ∫d4xAμ(x).
Why are the diagrams pictorially different (one of the have the funny cross at the end of the photon line)? Why do the gauge field appear in V× and not in V? Are V and V× identical?
Answer
In the first case, the vertex is a vertex in the common sense (used to construct diagrams).
In the second case, the gauge field is not dynamic (in a path integral formulation, you do not integrate over), it is a background field that is fixed. In that case, we are interested on the effect of this non-dynamical field on the electron field. This is useful to study, for example, the probability to create electron-positron pairs from the vacuum when there is a (very) strong electric field (imposed by the outside, say, the experimentalists in the lab).
EDIT:
To be more technical on the second case (the non-dynamical field): let's have a look at the partition function Z[˜A]=∫DψeiS0[ψ]+iSA[ψ], where S0 is the standard free fermion action, and S˜A[ψ]=−e∫d4x˜Aμˉψγμψ. Notice that we do not integrate over ˜Aμ in the functional integral. However, introducing S˜A[ψ] implies that a new vertex has to be used to compute the partition function, denoted by this wiggly line with crossed circle in the OP's question.
What is the point ? First, we see that ˜Aμ couples to the fermions as a usual E&M field. Therefore, if the system we want to described is given by some fermions in a classical E&M field, we can modelize that by using this ˜Aμ (the assumption here is that the effects of the fermions on the E&M is negligible). Second, by deriving lnZ with respect to ˜Aμ, we can compute the the correlation functions of the current. In this case, ˜Aμ plays the role of a source term.
If the E&M field is dynamical, we have to integrate over and now Z=∫DψDAeiS[ψ,A] where S[ψ,A]=∫d4x(ˉψ(iγμ(∂μ+ieAμ)−m)ψ−14Fμ,νFμ,ν). Now we integrate over ψ and A (with no ~) and the partition function does not depend on any sources. A plays the role of a dynamical photon, with its own propagator and there is now the standard vertex interaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment