Tuesday, 8 September 2020

quantum mechanics - Can any linear but non-unitary "time-evolution operator" be normalized to a unitary one?


A comment to this answer to another question states




I would imagine that for any linear non-unitary time-evolution operator, I can find a unitary one that will yield the same expectation values for every [physical state], which makes non-unitary time-evolution with manual normalization equal to unitary time evolution with standard normalization.



Is this correct?



Answer



No. For any particular initial state $|\psi_0\rangle$, we can manually normalize the hypothetical non-unitary but linear time-evolution operator $\hat{O}(t)$ in such a way that the manually normalized operator $\hat{O}_n(t) \equiv N_{\psi_0}(t)\, \hat{O}(t)$ produces a time-evolved trajectory $|\psi(t)\rangle = \hat{O}_n(t) |\psi_0\rangle$ with constant norm. But the key point is that the manual normalization function $N_{\psi_0}(t)$ necessarily depends on the particular initial state $|\psi_0\rangle$; there is not in general any manually normalized version of $\hat{O}(t)$ that preserves the norm along the trajectories for all initial states, like a unitary time-evolution operator does. The unitarity of the time-evolution operator is therefore a much stronger requirement than mere linearity, and you can't manually normalize an arbitrary linear time-evolution operator to a unitary one. (But note that the physical interpretation of unitarity is somewhat obscure in the projective-space formalism, where physical states don't have norms.)


As a simple example, consider the hypothetical linear but non-unitary time-evolution operator


$$\hat{O}(t) = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 1 & i \omega t \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right).$$


This operator trajectory is a one-parameter Lie group, i.e. it satisfies the composition property $\hat{O}(t_2) \hat{O}(t_1) = \hat{O}(t_2 + t_1)$. It preserves the norm of the initial state $(1, 0)$, so the manual normalization function for that initial state is the trivial $N(t) \equiv 1$. But the operator scales the norm of the initial state $(0, 1)$ over time as $\sqrt{1 + (\omega t)^2}$, so the manual normalization function for that initial state is $N(t) = 1/\sqrt{1 + (\omega t)^2}$. You can't normalize $\hat{O}(t)$ to simultaneously preserve the norm of both initial states. (Relatedly, the generator of this Lie group $$i \frac{d\hat{O}}{dt}|_{t=0} = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)$$ is not Hermitian.)


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...