Let's denote by |ψ(t)⟩ some wavefunction at time t. Then let's define the time evolution operator U(t1,t2) through
U(t2,t1)|ψ(t1)⟩=|ψ(t2)⟩
and Hamiltonian H through
H|ψ(t)⟩=i∂∂t|ψ(t)⟩.
(We have set ℏ=1.)
Question.
What is the relation between U and H, given that H doesn't depend explicitly on t?
Attempts.
It is well-known that the answer is U(t2,t1)=c⋅e−i(t2−t1)H for some scalar c.
Some sources postulate it follows from operator equation HU=i∂∂tU but we cannot integrate it like we could an ordinary differential equation f(x)g(x)=∂∂xg(x) (at least I don't know how to integrate operators!).
Then we could also "guess" the solution U(t2,t1)=c⋅e−i(t2−t1)H and verify by inserting into (1), but then we still need to show that this is the general solution, i.e., e−i(t2−t1)H spans the set of all solutions. Also this approach doesn't enlighten as to why we chose that particular guess.
Answer
For time-independent Hamiltonians, U(t)=eiHt follows from Stone's theorem on one-parameter unitary groups, since the Schrödinger equation Hψ=i∂tψ
For time-dependent Hamiltonians H(t)=H0+V(t), the time evolution actually is dependent on the start- and end-points, and the Schrödinger equation is iteratively solved by a Dyson series in the interaction picture, whose schematic form is U(t1,t2)=Texp(∫t2t1eiH0tV(t)e−iH0tdt)
No comments:
Post a Comment