Tuesday, 29 December 2015

geometry - Tiling rectangles with F pentomino plus rectangles


Inspired by Polyomino Z pentomino and rectangle packing into rectangle


Also in this series: Tiling rectangles with N pentomino plus rectangles


Tiling rectangles with T pentomino plus rectangles


Tiling rectangles with U pentomino plus rectangles


Tiling rectangles with V pentomino plus rectangles



Tiling rectangles with W pentomino plus rectangles


Tiling rectangles with X pentomino plus rectangles


The goal is to tile rectangles as small as possible with the F pentomino. Of course this is impossible, so we allow the addition of copies of a rectangle. For each rectangle $a\times b$, find the smallest area larger rectangle that copies of $a\times b$ plus at least one F-pentomino will tile. Example shown, with the $1\times 1$, you can tile a $3\times 3$ as follows.


F plus 1x1


Now we don't need to consider $1\times 1$ any longer as we have found the smallest rectangle tilable with copies of F plus copies of $1\times 1$.


There are at least 17 more solutions. More expected. I tagged it 'computer-puzzle' but you can certainly work some of these out by hand. The larger ones might be a bit challenging.



Answer



Here are a couple of $1 \times n$ solutions, which I believe to be optimal. They seem to follow some pattern(s), some of which are generalizable (spoiler ahead):



the rectangles are at the edges of the board; often one rectangle per edge, sometimes more, and sometimes (the $n$ = 12, 13 and 15 case) in the middle. The cases $n$ = 4, 6, 14 and 16 are extra 'nice' and can be generalized to $n=10k+4$ and $n=10k+6$ (though the solutions won't necessarily be optimal). Here's a nice visualization of the inductive step:

enter image description here

Note that these solutions also work for all $n$ not divisible by 5; e.g. two 1x7 rectangles fit in a single 1x14 rectangle, so we can just reuse that solution. There is a smaller one, though (see below).




The solutions for $1 \times 10$, $1 \times 18$ and $1 \times 20$ (all below) also seem to form some kind of generalizable family.


As @JaapScherphuis notes in the comment, there's a (probably non-optimal) generalizable solution for $1 \times n$, $n$ is even, rectangles, just like for the W-pentomino. By halving the rectangles, we can also obtain solutions for odd $n$, and the parts with just rectangles and no F-pentominos can be shortened.



Even $n$ fit in a $2n+1 \times 3n$ rectangle (left)
Odd $n$ fit in a $2n+1 \times 4n$ rectangle (right)
enter image description here



$1 \times 3$:




$8 \times 6 = 48$
enter image description here



$1 \times 4$:



$6 \times 6 = 36$
enter image description here



$1 \times 5$:




$11 \times 10 = 110$
enter image description here



$1 \times 6$:



$8 \times 8 = 64$
enter image description here



$1 \times 7$:




$20 \times 9 = 180$
enter image description here



$1 \times 8$:



$22 \times 9 = 198$
enter image description here



$1 \times 9$:




$13 \times 12 = 156$
enter image description here



$1 \times 10$:



$20 \times 11 = 220$
enter image description here



$1 \times 11$:




$13 \times 28 = 364$
enter image description here



$1 \times 12$:



$17 \times 17 = 289$
enter image description here



$1 \times 13$:




$15 \times 25 = 375$
enter image description here



$1 \times 14$:



$16 \times 16 = 256$
enter image description here



$1 \times 15$:




$17 \times 25 = 425$
enter image description here



$1 \times 16$:



$18 \times 18 = 324$
enter image description here



$1 \times 18$:




$19 \times 28 = 532$
enter image description here



$1 \times 20$:



$21 \times 30 = 630$
enter image description here





Some minimal solutions for $2 \times 2k+1$; first $2 \times 3$:




$10 \times 11 = 110$
enter image description here



$2 \times 5$:



$18 \times 20 = 360$
enter image description here



$2 \times 9$:




$30 \times 30 = 900$
enter image description here



$2 \times 11$ (a nice one, but IMHO equally nice as $2 \times 9$):



$36 \times 36 = 1296$
enter image description here



The last two are part of a generalizable solution, see the bottom of the post.





Another one for $3 \times 4$:



$14 \times 17 = 238$
enter image description here



and for $3 \times 5$:



$22 \times 30 = 660$
enter image description here






This night, I found a new one for $2 \times 7$ by combining the $2 \times 9$/$2 \times 11$ padding with the inner pattern for the $1 \times 16$. This is a hand-made solution so I'm not sure it's minimal:



38x38 = 1444
enter image description here



In general, the generalizable solutions for $1 \times (10k+4)$ resp. $1 \times (10k+6)$ give rise to solutions for $2 \times (10k+9)$ resp. $2 \times (10k+11)$; the $2 \times 7$ solution mentioned above is basically a subdivision of the $2 \times 21$ one minus some extraoneous padding.



The length of the red line is $10k+4$ or $10k+6$; this makes the purple line $10k+9$ or $10k+11$ and the total solution $(3n+3) \times (3n+3)$.

enter image description here



No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...