Sunday, 15 May 2016

mathematical physics - Combinatorial sum in a problem with a Fermi gas


I'm solving a problem involving a Fermi gas. There is a specific sum I cannot figure my way around.


A set of equidistant levels, indexed by $m=0,1,2 \ldots$, is populated by spinless fermions with population numbers $\nu_m =0 $ or $1$. I need to compute the following sum over the set of all possible configurations $\{ \nu_l \}$:




$Q(\beta,\beta_c) = \sum_{\{ \nu_l \}} \sum_{l} \prod_m \exp({\beta_c \, l \, \nu_l}-{ [ \beta \, m + i \phi] \, \nu_m} )$.



Any hints on how to deal with this are appreciated. This is not homework, it is a research problem.


It is known that $\beta >0$, $\beta_c>0$, and $\phi \in [0; 2 \pi ]$.


EDIT: corrected with the complex phase (the sum is coming from a generating function)



Answer



This is not an answer just some thoughts from playing with the expression. I've read the question before you included the phase, so for now let $\phi = 0$ (sorry it this makes my response useless for you).


I'll simply write $Z$ instead of your $Q(\beta, \beta_c)$ and also drop the arguments where obvious. Denote by $Z_{abc\dots}$ the partition function where we do not include the sites at $a, b, c, \dots$ in the problem. Also denote $f_k = 1 + \exp(-\beta k)$ and $g_k = 1 + \exp((\beta_c - \beta) k)$.


Now (unless I screwed up), by summing over the site at $k$ we can get the relation $$Z = f_kZ_k + g_k \sum_{\nu \setminus k} \prod_{m \neq k} \exp(-\beta m \nu_m) $$ and iterating it $$Z = \left( \prod_{m \in abc\dots z} f_m \right) Z_{abc\dots z} + $$ $$ \left(g_a f_b \dots f_z + f_a g_b \dots f_z + \cdots + f_a f_b \dots g_z) \right) \sum_{\nu \setminus abc\dots z} \prod_{m \neq abc \dots z} \exp(-\beta m \nu_m).$$



It is a simple observation that for the reduces system consisting of a single level $a$ we get $Z_{bc \ldots z} = g_a$ so the first term above gives a similar contribution like the other terms (all but one factors are $f$ and one of them is $g$). Therefore, we can write $$Z = \left( \prod_{m} f_m \right) \left ( \sum_k \frac{g_k} { f_k} \right).$$


These expressions are exact in case we have finite number of states. Otherwise they are just formal and are to be understood as limits only if everything converges.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...