Wednesday, 4 January 2017

quantum field theory - OPE of three operators


In the process of thinking about this question, I realized that I don't understand something very fundamental about operator product expansions.


Consider a product of 3 local operators in a 2d CFT:



$$ X(x) Y(y) Z(z) = \sum_{n=-N}^{\infty} A_n(x) Z(z) (x-y)^n, $$


where we have substituted $X(x) Y(y)$ for the $XY$ OPE. This expression contains the singular terms for $x = y$.


Now because by definition of OPE $A_n(x)$ is a local operator at $x$, we can use the $A_n Z$ OPE again:


$$ X(x) Y(y) Z(z) = \sum_{n=-N}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-M}^{\infty} B_{nm} (x) (x-y)^n (x-z)^m. $$ This expression contains the singular terms for $x = y$ and $x = z$.


Question: where did the $y = z$ singular terms go?


This is likely related to the convergence of the series, but I wasn't able to formulate a convincing argument.



Answer



Let me redo the calculation, while explicitly writing OPE coefficients. Let $(A_n(z))_n$ be a basis of operators at $z$. We use the two OPEs $$ Y(y)Z(z) = \sum_n c_n(y,z) A_n(z) $$ and $$ X(x)A_n(z) = \sum_m d_{m,n}(x,z) A_m(z) $$ We end up with the result $$ X(x)Y(y)Z(z) = \sum_{m,n} c_n(y,z)d_{m,n}(x,z) A_m(z) $$ where the coefficient of $A_m(z)$ is $\sum_n c_n(y,z)d_{m,n}(x,z)$. This coefficient is an infinite sum, and it can very well be singular as $x\to y$, although this is not manifest. For instance, $$ \frac{1}{x-y} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty (y-z)^n (x-z)^{-n-1} $$ You can recover a similar result in your calculation by distinguishing more clearly the operator basis from the OPE coefficients. Your operators $B_{m,n}(x)$ should not all be linearly independent, and you should rewrite them in terms of a basis of operators.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...