Saturday, 1 July 2017

scattering - Green functions in QFT


What is the sense of Green function |ˆT(u1(x1)...un(xn)ˆS)|,ˆS=ˆTeiˆL(x)d4x? How is it connected with scattering processes?



Answer



The Green's function you have given arises as one step in the computation of elements of the S-matrix in the LSZ-formalism, if one considers the S-matrix in the interaction (or Dirac) picture.


Our goal is to compute scattering amplitudes of the form ipi,in|jqj,out. In the course of the computation, we reduce this to the n-point function of the full Heisenberg fields Ω|ˆTkϕ(xk)|Ω. Switching to the interaction picture, we relate the Heisenberg fields to the interaction field through the time evolution operator ˆU(t1,t2) fulfilling the relation itˆU(t1,t2)=ˆHI(t1)ˆU(t1,t2) which is solved by the Dyson series


U(t,t0)=n(i)ntt0dt1t1t0dt2tn1t0dtnˆHI(t1)ˆHI(tn)=n(i)nn!tt0dt1tt0dt2tt0dtnˆT(ˆHI(t1)ˆHI(tn))=ˆTeitt0HI(t)dt


This is essentially your ˆS, only that instead of the Lagrangian density we have the Hamiltonian density (I don't know a case where the Lagrangian appears from the top of my head).


In the interaction picture, one finds (after a tedious calculation) that


Ω|kϕ(xk)|Ω=lim



This way, the function you have given is (up to normalization) essentially an n-point function, which in turn is essentially a scattering amplitude.


The entire computation and reasoning can be found in any decent QFT book, I have only tried to motivate the appearence of this term. Please let me know if you want more detail on something (or if this wasn't helpful at all).


EDIT: You are right, the |p,\mathrm{out}\rangle states are fock states in the asymptotic Hilbert spaces. But, inverting the mode expression for the free field, one finds that


a_{in}(\vec{p}) = \frac{\mathrm{i}}{\sqrt{2E_q}}\int \mathrm{d}^3x \mathrm{e}^{iqx}\overset{\leftrightarrow}{\partial_0}\phi_{in}(x)


where x^0 is arbitrary (this is another tedious calculation) and f \overset{\leftrightarrow}{\partial_0} g := f(\partial_0 g) - (\partial_0 f)g . By this, you can write


\langle \Omega,\mathrm{in} | p,\mathrm{out}\rangle = \sqrt{2E_p}\langle \Omega,\mathrm{in} | a_in(p) | \Omega,\mathrm{out}\rangle = -\mathrm{i}\int\mathrm{d}^3 x\mathrm{e}^{ipx}\overset{\leftrightarrow}{\partial_0}\langle \Omega |\phi_{in}(x)|\Omega \rangle


. By repeatedly applying this, you can reduce the question of \langle \prod_i p_i, \mathrm{in} | \prod_j q_j,\mathrm{out}\rangle to the n-point functions.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...