Now, to calculate the gravitational potential due to a ring(or any object for that matter) at a distance r we consider a tiny mass dm on the ring, and calculate the potential dV due to this element giving dV=Gdm/y and then "sum up the dV's" (integrate) =>V(y)=GM/y. But really, dV is the infinitesimal change in potential for an infinitesimal change in y, and dV=V(y+dy)−V(y) doesn't seem to have any physical significance and doesn't seem to mean the potential due to dm. Then, how did we simply treat dV as the potential due the element dm and "sum these up" using integration?
I've always thought of integration as simply a way of solving a differential equation: for an infinitesimal change in the function df(x) in the interval dx, df(x)=f(x+dx)−f(x) to which we are supposed to assign a physical meaning and then write the differential equation & solve it. Why can we treat integration as summation of tiny dF's or dx′s
Answer
It is not the case that dV=V(y+dy)−V(y).
The problem with your reasoning is that dV(y) isn't the change in potential due to small element of y, but rather dV(y) is a small element of potential resulting from the small element of mass dm located at position y.
Therefore by summing the dV up, you are adding together the small bit of potential produced by each bit of mass dm that makes up the ring.
No comments:
Post a Comment