Friday 10 November 2017

newtonian mechanics - How can we treat dV like this?


enter image description here


Now, to calculate the gravitational potential due to a ring(or any object for that matter) at a distance $r$ we consider a tiny mass $dm$ on the ring, and calculate the potential $dV$ due to this element giving $dV = Gdm/y$ and then "sum up the $dV$'s" (integrate) $=> V(y) = GM/y$. But really, $dV$ is the infinitesimal change in potential for an infinitesimal change in $y$, and $dV = V(y+dy)-V(y)$ doesn't seem to have any physical significance and doesn't seem to mean the potential due to $dm$. Then, how did we simply treat $dV$ as the potential due the element $dm$ and "sum these up" using integration?


I've always thought of integration as simply a way of solving a differential equation: for an infinitesimal change in the function $df(x)$ in the interval $dx$, $df(x) = f(x+dx)-f(x)$ to which we are supposed to assign a physical meaning and then write the differential equation & solve it. Why can we treat integration as summation of tiny $dF$'s or $dx's$



Answer



It is not the case that $dV = V(y+dy) - V(y)$.


The problem with your reasoning is that $dV(y)$ isn't the change in potential due to small element of $y$, but rather $dV(y)$ is a small element of potential resulting from the small element of mass $dm$ located at position $y$.



Therefore by summing the $dV$ up, you are adding together the small bit of potential produced by each bit of mass $dm$ that makes up the ring.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...