As we know in Rutherfords gold foil experiment, Rutherford shot decayed alpha particles into a very thin sheet of gold foil, and after many trials looking into a telescope they observed that about 1 in 20000 alpha particles bounced off this "concentrated, positively charged nucleus' more than 90 degrees. Since they were using the naked eye and with a microscope counting the light beams from the ZnS screen, is this a pure estimate or is there an actual mathematical formula to deduce this number?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Why can't we use fissions products for electricity production ? As far has I know fissions products from current nuclear power plants cr...
-
How can we know the order of a Feynman diagram just from the pictorial representation? Is it the number of vertices divided by 2? For exampl...
-
As the title says. It is common sense that sharp things cut, but how do they work at the atomical level? Answer For organic matter, such a...
-
This image from NASA illustrates drag coefficients for several shapes: It is generally accepted that some variation of the teardrop/airfoil...
-
I have been studying scattering theory in Sakurai's quantum mechanics. The phase shift in scattering theory has been a major conceptual ...
-
Inspired by Polyomino Z pentomino and rectangle packing into rectangle Also in this series: Tiling rectangles with F pentomino plus rectangl...
-
Literature states neutral pion decay by QED cannot occur directly because the pion is uncharged. However, I cannot see why Photons are not a...
No comments:
Post a Comment