Wednesday, 7 November 2018

electromagnetism - What is wrong with this form of the Maxwell-Faraday equation?


What is wrong with this form of the Maxwell-Faraday equation?


$$\oint \vec{E}\ \partial \vec l= \bigcirc \hspace{-1.4em} \int \hspace{-.6em} \int \frac{\partial \vec B}{\partial t}$$


"Line integral of the electric field is equal to the double integral of partial derivative of magnetic field with respect to time".


So far as I remember the correct form used to be "Line integral of electric field is always (negative) surface integral of partially derived magnetic field..."



Answer



The integral form of the Maxwell-Faraday law is $$ \oint\limits_{\partial S} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\boldsymbol\ell = -\frac{d}{dt} \int\limits_S \mathbf{B} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{n}}\,da.$$ If you want to apply the time derivative to the integral on the RHS, you must account for two effects that can cause a change in the magnetic flux: the time derivative of the magnetic field, and the velocity $\mathbf{v}$ of the surface $S$ through the field. This gives $$ \oint\limits_{\partial S} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\boldsymbol\ell = -\int\limits_S \frac{\partial\mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{n}}\,da\; - \oint\limits_{\partial S} \mathbf{B} \times \mathbf{v} \cdot d\boldsymbol\ell.$$ (See, e.g., Jackson 3rd edition, eq. 5.137.) You are correct that there must be a minus sign on the RHS; this is the mathematical statement of Lenz's law.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...