Friday, 8 March 2019

homework and exercises - Is this problem from Griffiths' "Classical electromagnetism" correct?


I am talking about pbl 2.46 pag 107.


The potential $$\frac{A}{r} \, \exp{(-\lambda r)}$$ is given I have to find the charge density and the electric field.


The book says the solution for the charge density is: $$\left[\delta^3(r)-\dfrac{\lambda^2}{r} \, \exp{(-\lambda r)}\right]\, \epsilon_0\, A$$


The first part comes from $\nabla^2 \, \dfrac{1}{r}$ , the second comes from $\nabla^2\,\exp{(-\lambda r)}$.


I think this part is missing: $2\,\nabla\, \dfrac{1}{r} \, \cdot\, \nabla\,\exp{(-\lambda r)} $.


Or am I misunderstanding something?



Answer




This is but the screened Poisson equation. Since the functions are radial, only the radial part of the Laplacian survives, $$ \nabla^2 (e^{-\lambda r}/r) = \frac{1}{r^2}\partial_r ( r^2 \partial_r (e^{-\lambda r}/r))= \frac{1}{r^2}\partial_r \left ( -\lambda r e^{-\lambda r} +e^{-\lambda r} r^2\partial_r \frac{1}{r}\right )\\ = \frac{1}{r^2}\partial_r \left( r^2\partial_r \frac{1}{r}\right ) ~ e^{-\lambda r} -\lambda e^{-\lambda r} \left(\frac{1}{r^2}+\partial_r \frac{1}{r} \right ) + \lambda^2 \frac{ e^{-\lambda r}}{r}. $$ Note the cross $O(\lambda)$ term vanishes.


Since
$$ \nabla^2 \frac{1}{r}=-4\pi \delta^{(3)} (\vec{r})= -\frac{\delta(r)}{r^2}, $$ one has $$ (\nabla^2 -\lambda^2) \left (\frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r}\right)=-\frac{\delta(r)}{r^2}. $$


So your text is just fine. You probably misunderstand, that, in fact, $\nabla^2 e^{-\lambda r}= (\lambda^2 -2\lambda/r )e^{-\lambda r}$, as evident from above. This additional $O(\lambda)$ term here exactly cancels the cross term you wrote down. (Try evaluating $\nabla^2 r$ to see the point.)


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...