When we solve the Schrödinger equation on an infinite domain with a given potential U, much of the time the lowest possible energy for a solution corresponds to a non-zero energy. For example, for the simple harmonic oscillator with frequency ω, the possible energies are ℏω(n+12) for n=0,1,… . Some of the time, solutions with zero energy are possibly mathematically, but boundary conditions would mean that such solutions would be everywhere zero, and hence the probability of finding a particle anywhere would be zero. (For example, an infinite potential well).
However, when solving the Schrödinger equation for a particle moving freely on a circle of lenfth 2π with periodic boundary conditions Ψ(0,t)=Ψ(2π,t) and ∂Ψ∂x(0,t)=∂Ψ∂x(2π,t), I have found a (normalised) solution Ψ(x,t)=12π with corresponding energy 0. I can't find a way to discount this mathematically, and it seems to make sense physically as well. Is this a valid solution, and so is it sometimes allowable to have solutions with 0 energy? Or is there something I'm missing?
Answer
In my view, the important question to answer here is a special case of the more general question
Given a space M, what are the physically allowable wavefunctions for a particle moving on M?
Aside from issues of smoothness wavefunctions (which can be tricky; consider the Dirac delta potential well on the real line for example), as far as I can tell there are precisely two other conditions that one needs to consider:
Does the wavefunction in question satisfy the desired boundary conditions?
Is the wavefunction in question square integrable?
If a wavefunction satisfies these properties, then I would be inclined to assert that it is physically allowable.
In your case where M is the circle S1, the constant solution is smooth, satisfies the appropriate conditions to be a function on the circle (periodicity), and is square integrable, so it is a physically allowed state. It also happens to be an eigenvector of the Hamiltonian operator with zero eigenvalue; there's nothing wrong with a state having zero energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment