Monday 20 July 2020

homework and exercises - How to prove that Weyl spinors equations are Lorentz invariant?



The Dirac equation is given by:


$[iγ^μ ∂_μ − m] ψ(x) = 0$ .


We can prove that it's Lorentz invariant when:



$ψ(x) \to S^{-1} \psi'(x')$ and $\partial_\mu \to \Lambda^\nu_\mu \partial'_\nu$, where


$S(\Lambda) = 1 -\frac{i}{4} \sigma_{\mu\nu}\epsilon^{\mu\nu}$


which applying that for Dirac equation covariance that $\Lambda^\nu_\mu S \gamma^\mu S^{-1}=\gamma^\nu$


Now the Weyl spinors equations are given by:


$i \bar{\sigma}.\partial\psi_L=0,~~~~~~~(1)$


$i \sigma.\partial\psi_R=0, ~~~~~~~~~~(2)$


where $\sigma^\mu\equiv (1,\underline{\sigma})$ and $\bar{\sigma}^\mu\equiv (1,-\underline{\sigma})$


Look for instance Peskin's book "An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory"


where the Lorentz transformation of $\psi_L$ and $\psi_R$ are given by:


$\psi_L \to (1-i\theta.\frac{\sigma}{2}- \beta.\frac{\sigma}{2}) \psi_L$,



$\psi_R \to (1-i\theta.\frac{\sigma}{2}+ \beta.\frac{\sigma}{2}) \psi_R$,


How one can show that (1) and (2) are Lorentz invariant ?



Answer



The key thing is you are contracting $\partial_\mu$ into either $\sigma^\mu,\bar{\sigma}^\mu$. Consider contracting a general vector $p^\mu$ $$\sigma^\mu p_\mu = \left(\begin{array}{cc} p^0-p^3& -p^1+ip^2\\ -p^1-ip^2 &p^0+p^3 \end{array}\right)$$ Note that the determinant is just the norm of the vector: $(p^0)^2-(p^1)^2-(p^2)^2-(p^3)^2$.


If you sandwich this matrix between some $U$ and $U^{-1}$ the determinant is unchanged $$\det\left(U\sigma^\mu p_\mu U^{-1}\right)=\det\left(\sigma^\mu p_\mu \right)$$ so it corresponds to some Lorentz transformation.


So we can write $$\sigma^\mu (\Lambda^{\mu'}_\mu p_{\mu'})=U(\Lambda)\sigma^\mu p_\mu U(\Lambda)^{-1}$$ for some 2 by 2 matrix $U(\Lambda)$.


It turns out that $U(\Lambda)$ is the very same matrix you are using to transform your right spinor, so that is why the Weyl equations are invariant.


For instance as an exercise, take a finite rotation about the z-axis: $$I-i\frac{\theta}{2}\sigma^3+\dots=\exp(-i\frac{\theta}{2}\sigma^3)=\left(\begin{array}{cc} \exp(-i\frac{\theta}{2})& 0\\ 0 &\exp(+i\frac{\theta}{2}) \end{array}\right)$$ You can show that $$\exp(-i\frac{\theta}{2}\sigma^3)\,\sigma^\mu p_\mu\,\exp(+i\frac{\theta}{2}\sigma^3)$$ does transform the $p^1,p^2$ components as a rotation by angle $\theta$.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...