Thursday, 23 July 2020

quantum field theory - Derivation of Baryon Number conservation?



The symmetry connected to Baryon/Lepton Number conservation is, as far as I understand, global U(1) symmetry (which is called here global gauge invariance).


Does anyone know of an explicit computation of this, using Noether etc.?


Any idea, link or book recommendation would be much appreciated



Answer



"Derivation" of Baryon Number Conservation -


Consider the QCD Lagrangian (density)


L=ˉψ(iγμDμm)ψ14GaμνGμνa


where the symbols have their usual meaning.


This is invariant under U(1), which is nothing but a multiplication of ψ by a global phase factor eiθ. This is because ˉψ picks up a corresponding factor with an opposite phase, and the two cancel each other, in the first term.


To make use of the Noether theorem, rewriting this as ψ(x)=eiθ ψ(x)ψ(x)+iθψ(x)

to first order (small θ, as in infinitesimal transformations). This U(1) invariance form is a very special case of invariance under global transformations of the type ψ(x)=eiθaΓaψ(x)ψ(x)+iθaΓaψ(x)
where Γa refers to the generators of the unitary group acting on the quark field ψ.



Using the Noether's theorem for the general case, one has to go through the usual steps: writing the change in the action, δSd4xδL=0

then expanding this δL in terms of a changes in ψ and those in μψ, then integrating by parts to arrive at the conserved Noether current Jμa(x)=ˉψ(x)γμΓaψ(x)
which satisfies μJμa(x)=0
The same may be cast into the form of a charge Qa=d3xJ0a(x)
with dQadt=d3xJ0a(x)t=d3xJa=0
provided the currents decay sufficiently rapidly at the spatial infinity. That condition is anyways employed even in electrodynamics in the deriving total charge conservation, using an identical argument.


Thus, the zeroth component of this Noether current, integrated over 3-space (hence giving a charge), is globally conserved. That's a powerful result, for the general case.


Returning back to the issue of interest - U(1) invariance. Making use of the general result, you may notice that in this case, there is no index a and the sole gamma is identity (correlating the two equations). Thus, substituting in the general case, our conserved current reads Jμ=ˉψγμψ

and the conserved charge reads Q=d3xˉψγ0ψ
which can be rewritten as Q=d3xψψ
by using the well known properties of gamma matrices.


Notice at this point two things -


1) We have used invariance arguments, which can always accommodate a multiplicative factor, since that won't change the invariance.


2) ψψ is a number density. (You may want to recall the definition of number operator in e.g. harmonic oscillator in basic QM, and extrapolate.)


Thus, taking QCD Lite for example, where the quarks of interest are u, d and s, any baryon would be composed of these, and we can always normalize the conserved charge by a factor of 1/3, one for each quark flavor. Also, the number density integrated over 3-space would give a number. Hence, putting these two together, we can write as the conserved charge B=13d3x ψψ

(where ψ covers the three flavors), which can be interpreted as, (gulp) Baryon Number.


Thus, baryon number can be interpreted as the conserved charge corresponding to U(1) invariance of the QCD Lagrangian.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...