Monday 13 July 2020

many body - What is "trivial" about the trivial topological superconducting phase?


Once more I am stuck on my favorite word: "trivial". I am reading a bunch of stuff about topological superconductors at the moment and people keep talking about having to distinguish between the topologically "trivial" and "nontrivial" phases.


To have the easiest possible concrete example, consider the one dimensional p-wave superconductor:


$H=H_{metal} + H_{pairing}\\ H_{metal}= \sum_p c_p^\dagger\left(\frac{p^2}{2m}-\mu\right)c_p\\ H_{pairing}= p\frac{1}{2}\left(\Delta c_p^\dagger c_{-p}^\dagger + \Delta^* c_{-p}c_{p} \right)$


which has the following energy spectrum


$E_{\pm}=\pm \sqrt{\left(\frac{p^2}{2m}-\mu\right)^2+|\Delta|^2p^2}$


The book I am reading (Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors, by B. Andrei Bernevig and Taylor L. Hughes), refers to the $\mu<0, \; \Delta=0$ case as the trivial insulating limit (page 198, bottom).



I think I do understand why the $\mu<0$ and $\mu>0$ are topologically distinct. However I can't deduce why the $\mu<0, \; \Delta=0$ case



  • is said to be trivial. What is the trivial referring to?

  • is the insulating limit. I thought $H_{metal}$ describes a 1D metal of spinless fermions.


I am most grateful for any clarifying answers.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...