Monday, 24 August 2020

homework and exercises - Bessel function representation of spacelike KG propagator


Preliminaries: In their QFT text, Peskin and Schroeder give the KG propagator (eq. 2.50)


D(xy)≡<0|ϕ(x)ϕ(y)|0>=d3p(2π)312ωpeip(xy),


where ωp|p|2+m2. For lightlike separations, we can choose a frame where xy is purely in the time-direction and the propagator can be put into the form (2.51)



D(xy)=14π2mdωω2m2eiω(y0x0),


where I use the diag η=(,+,+,+) convention.


Now, one has the following integral representation of the modified Bessel function (http://dlmf.nist.gov/10.32.8)


K1(z)=z1dtt21ezt=zm2mdtt2m2ezt/m,


where we go to the second line by rescaling the integration variable tt/m. Comparing (1) with (2) suggests


D(xy)=m(2π)2|yx|K1(m|yx|),


where we have written the time separation in terms of the Lorentz invariant i(y0x0)=|yx|. (Note: there is an issue in what I've written here in that the integral representation (2) is only valid for |argz|<π/2 and |yx| is on the imaginary axis (|argz|=π), but I think one could infinitesimally displace z off of the imaginary axis to get a convergent integral. Check me on that.)


Anyway, for spacelike separations, we can choose a frame where yx=yxr. Performing the polar integrations yield


D(xy)=i2(2π)2rdppeiprp2+m2.


Finally, PS claim that taking a contour integral in the upper half plane (making sure to avoid the branch cut at +im) will give



D(xy)=1(2π)2rmdρρeρrρ2m2,

where ρip.


Question: I know from plugging into Mathematica that the spacelike propagator (3) can also be expressed as a modified Bessel function K1. Moreover, the integration bounds of (3) and (2) are even the same. However, I don't see how to transform the spacelike propagator integral (3) into the form of (2). Any ideas?


(I'd prefer, if at all possible, to use the integral representation that I've quoted (2) and used for the timelike case rather than some other representation of the modified Bessel function.)



Answer



This can be seen by partial integration


ρρ2m2=ρρ2m2


OP edit: More explicitly, we use this to write (3) as


D(xy)=1(2π)2rmdρρρ2m2eρr=1(2π)2r[ρ2m2eρr]m1(2π)2rmdρρ2m2ρeρr=1(2π)2mdρρ2m2eρr=m(2π)2rK1(mr)


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...