I want to understand why we write in the formalism of second quantization for a single particle operator
ˆH=∑iεiˆa†iˆai
where
εi is the eigenvalue of the solved Schroedinger equation. Is it just the fact that I know that
a†iˆai=ˆni and I associate the Hamiltonian with the energy of the system:
H=E=∑iniεi, or how can one understand this?
In the second quantization (physics of many-body systems) language, the (physical) question is "How many particle in each state?". Suppose that there is nα particles in state α, each particle in this state has energy ϵα, then the total energy in this state is: nαϵα. If we want to have the total energy of the system, we just simply add all possible state's energies: E=∑αnαϵα
We see that E and
nα are physical observables. In QM, each physical observable corresponds to a hermitian operator. Hence, naturally, E is corresponding to Hamiltonian, which is the energy operator; and
nα is corresponding to
ˆnα, occupation number operator. It turns out that
nα and E are eigenvalues of
ˆnα and H, respectively. So we have:
H=∑αˆnαϵα
The question now is to find the number operator. We discuss here the bosonic case. In the many-body system, since the number of particle can be changed, we introduce the creation and annihilation operators: a† and a. Their definitions are: a†(k)|0⟩=|k⟩
a†(kn+1)|k1,k2,...,kn⟩=(constant)1|k1,k2,...,kn,kn−1⟩
a|0⟩=0
a(k)|k1,k2,...,kn⟩=(constant)2∑iδ(k,ki)|k1,k2,...,ki−1,ki+1,...,kn⟩
(constant)2 and
(constant)1 can be obtained by permutation:
(constant)1=√n+1,
(constant)2=1/√n. When acting
a†(k)a(k) on a n-particle state
|k1,k2,...,kn⟩, we get:
a†(k)a(k)|k1,k2,...,kn⟩=n|k1,k2,...,kn⟩
which is exactly the same as the action of the occupation number operator on the state
|k1,k2,...,kn⟩. Then,
ˆn≡a†a.
Is that what you want?
No comments:
Post a Comment