I'm trying to solve problem 2.35 in Griffith's Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (2nd edition), but it left me rather confused, so I hope you can help me to understand this a little bit better.
The aim of the problem is to find the probability that a particle with kinetic energy E>0 will reflect when it approaches a potential drop V0 (a step potential).
I started with putting up the Schrödinger equations before and after the potential drop: x<0:V(x)=0 and x>0:V(x)=−V0.
ψ″
\psi''+\mu^2\psi=0, x>0
where k=\sqrt{2mE}/\hbar and \mu=\sqrt{2m(E+V_0)}/\hbar
This would give me the general solutions
\psi(x)=Ae^{ikx}+Be^{-ikx}, x<0
\psi(x)=Fe^{i\mu x}+Ge^{-i\mu x},x>0
Now, I resonate that in order to have a physically admissable solution B=0 since the second term blows up when x goes to -\infty and F=0 since the first term in the second row blows up when x goes to \infty. This would leave us with the solutions
\psi(x)=Ae^{ikx}, x<0
\psi(x)=Ge^{-i\mu x},x>0
which I then could use boundary conditions to solve. However, I realise that this is wrong since I need B to calculate the refection probability. In the solution to this book they get the following general solutions (they don't say how the got them though).
\psi(x)=Ae^{ikx}+Be^{-ikx}, x<0
\psi(x)=Fe^{i\mu x},x>0
This is not very well explained in the book so I would really appriciate if someone could explain how to decide what parts of the general solutions that I should remove in order to get the correct general solution for a specific problem.
Answer
e^{-i k x} does not blow up as x \rightarrow -\infty. You're thinking in terms of real exponentials, but this is a complex exponential. That is, as long as k is real we have:
- \lim\limits_{x \rightarrow -\infty} e^{- k x} = \infty
- \lim\limits_{x \rightarrow -\infty} e^{- i k x} does not exist (since e^{- i k x} = \cos{kx} - i \sin{kx}).
So that explains why the B term is still there in the solution.
The reason that Griffiths discounts the G term is because it represents a reflected wave traveling from the positive x direction.
Think about it this way:
The problem at hand is of a particle coming from the -x direction and encountering a sudden potential drop. The particle arriving gives rise to the term A e^{i k x}, as this is a traveling wave moving in the +x direction.
When the particle encounters the barrier, it can either reflect (giving rise to the term B e^{- i k x}) or transmit (giving rise to the term F e^{i \mu x}).
Note that there is no circumstance under which a particle could be coming from the +x direction in the region to the right of the potential drop, which is what the term G e^{- i \mu x} would imply. A particle comes from the left, and then either moves forward to the right or reflects back to the left. A situation under which the particle travels towards the potential drop from the +x direction is not physically admissible under this circumstance.
So we drop the term G e^{- i \mu x}, and we're left with
\psi(x) = \begin{cases} A e^{i k x} + B e^{- i k x}, & x < 0 \\ F e^{i \mu x}, & x > 0 \end{cases}
as described in the book.
No comments:
Post a Comment