What is the physical meaning of these commutation relations: [Lz,L±]=±ℏL± and [L+,L−]=2ℏLz ?
Answer
Short intro to ladders
As you say, they're ladder operators. Let's get rid of the annoying ℏ by setting it to one, and call them more systematically L−1,L0,L1 instead of L−,Lz,L+.
Then, the commutation relations take the uniform form
[Ln,Lm]=(n−m)Lm+n
If we had countably many of these, we'd have a Witt algebra, if there was a central charge, that would become a Virasoro algebra, but lets stay with these three for now.
Now, ladder operators should raise and lower stuff, right, just like going up and down a ladder. It all starts with eigenvectors |l⟩ of L0, i.e. L0|l⟩=l|l⟩. Now, through the commutation relations, we get that
L0(L−1)|l⟩=(l−1)(L−1)|l⟩andL0(L1)|l⟩=(l+1)(L1)|l⟩
so L1 raises the weight l of the vector by 1, while L−1 lowers the weight of the vector by 1.
The physical importance
Whenever you see an algebra like this, it means that the eigenvalue of L0 is quantized, since the ladder operators raise/lower the weight in discrete steps. It means that, in terms of the natural operations on the vector space on which a representation of this algebra exists, spaces spanned by eigenvectors of L0 while not differing by natural numbers do not overlap. In particular, if you know there should be a highest/lowest weight state from which all others arise by applying the ladder operators, you know the complete discrete set of eigenvalues of L0 allowed for the system under consideration, and we can in fact find all allowed representations.
The algebra we are looking at is actually su(2), which Lie integrates to the universal cover SU(2) of the rotation group SO(3), so what we are constructing are the spinor representations of non-relativistic QM.
The technique of the highest weight
We seek unitary, irreducible representations V of the algebra. Unitarity means that L†n=L−n, irreduciblility that there is no subrepresentation W⊂V.
Let |l⟩ be a highest weight vector, i.e. L1|l⟩=0. Define the Verma module (don't try to understand the mathematician's definition of this if you are not prepared for serious math)
˜Vl:=span{Ln−1|l⟩|n∈N}
Unitarity demands further that the rep we would like to obtain should possess a positive-definite inner product. Normalize ⟨l|l⟩ and examine the level 1 vectors L−1|l⟩:
⟨l|L1L−1|l⟩=2l!≥0
So, l<0 is out of the game. If l=0, then L1(L−1|l⟩)=2l|l⟩=0, so L−1|l⟩ is a second highest weight vector and generates the subrep ˜V−1⊂˜V0. We can obtain an irreducible, unitary rep by setting
V0:=˜V0/˜V−1
which is the trivial spin-0 rep.
A generalization of the above argument leads us to the statement that level n vectors |v⟩=Ln−1|l⟩ have norm
⟨v|v⟩=n−1∏i=0(2l−i)
which is non-unitary for l∉12N and has null-vectors otherwise. The irreducible unitary reps are generally obtained by
Vl:=˜Vl/˜V−l−1withl∈12N
The conclusion
It were the commutation relations alone (together with ordinary unitarity conditions) that have shown us that spin/angular momentum is restricted to half-integers and integers. One can, by further thought, see that the half-integer reps do not induce reps of the SO(3), but only of the SU(2), and that therefore "true" angular momentum is quantized as an integer. Quantization of such generalized charges (in the Noetherian sense) is thus a natural consequence of the commutation relation of the algebra of the associated (Lie) symmetry group.
No comments:
Post a Comment