Wednesday, 13 May 2015

quantum mechanics - Time dependence of a function of an operator


Suppose I know the time evolution of an operator is given by ˙ˆO=i[ˆH(t),ˆO(t)]. Now I want to look at a function ˆf(ˆO, and I want to know the time evolution of the "values" of this function. I assume that I can expand ˆf in a taylor series: Since ˆO has an Unitary time evolution U, I can write: ˆf(ˆO(t))=ΣiciˆOi(t)=Σici(ˆUt,t0ˆO(t0)ˆUt0,t)i=ΣiciˆUt,t0ˆO(t0)iˆUt0,t=ˆUt,t0ˆf(ˆO(t0))ˆUt0,t

Then computing the time derivative will yield: ddtˆf(ˆO(t))=i[ˆH,ˆf(ˆO(t))]


However, I fail to arrive at this same result, if I try to compute the derivative directly: ddtˆf(ˆO(t))=Σj=1cjjˆOj1(t)˙ˆO=Σj=1cjjˆOj1(t)i[ˆH(t),ˆO(t)]

To arrive at the same result, I would have to permute the Hamiltonian ˆH through the whole product (ˆO(t))j1. I'm stuck here. Am I making a mistake somewhere?




Answer



Derivative of product of operator valued functions is :


ddt(A(t)B(t))=(ddtA(t))B(t)+A(t)(ddtB(t)).


You can proove it using standard definition of derivative.


You have missed this non commutativity of derivative of an operator with operator itself in writing down the derivative after Taylor expansion. Once you fix it you can see that both expressions for time evolution of function of an operator will agree.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...