Tuesday 26 April 2016

general relativity - Using the Metric in Book Gravitation (MTW)


Here is the whole Box 2.2, at Page 55


Gravitation Box 2.2



The dot behind the second $-p^2$ seems to be a "planck mass" (sarcasm, flea egg) or just the book's style to use Dot behind the equations. So the Equation is basically;


$-p^2=m=E^2-p^2$ which can be written


$-p^2=E^2-p^2$ and if we add on both sides $+p^2$ we have


$0 = E^2$


My question is "What is wrong here?" as here is no logic.


The same problem is already written above as $p^2=-E^2+p^2$ which is again nothing else than
$0=-E^2$


In my World I see it so; $m^2=0$
thus $m^2=E^2-p^2$ is $0=E^2-p^2$ and $E^2=p^2$



Answer




It's a bit hard to see in this typography, but the two p are supposed to be different. The p on the l.h.s. is the four-momentum $p = (p^0,p^1,p^2,p^3)^T$, the one on the r.h.s is the three-momentum $\vec p = (p^1,p^2,p^3)^T$, and then $$ p^2 = E^2 - \vec p ^2$$ for $p^0 = E$ is tautologically true just from the definition of $p^2$.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...