Thursday, 13 October 2016

quantum field theory - Hermiticity of Dirac Operator $gamma^{mu}D_{mu}$ and Expansion in eigenmodes


I'm interested to know under what conditions $\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}$ is a hermitian operator.


I am studying the Fujikawa method of anomalies and I see that many sources have different answers for this. Some claim that $\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}$ is hermitian or possibly anti hermitian in Euclidean space, or that $i\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}$ is hermitian in Minkowski space. I need the hermiticiy condition so that I can expand the Dirac spinors $\Psi(x)$ and $\bar{\Psi}(x)$ in a basis of orthonormal eigenvectors of the Dirac operator to perform the path integral.


Another question I have is this expansion. I would like something of the form


$$\Psi(x) = \sum_n \psi_n(x)a_n$$


$$\bar{\Psi}(x) = \sum_n \bar{\psi_n}(x)\bar{b}_n$$


where $a_n$ and $\bar{b}_n$ are elements of a Grassmann algebra. But how is $\bar{\psi}_n$ defined? Some references define $\bar{\psi}_n(x)$ = ${\psi}(x)^{\dagger}$, but I guess it depends on how you are defining your inner product.



Thanks, I've attached some references below.


Fujikawa 1) https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1195


Fujikawa 2) https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2848


TASI Anomalies https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0509097



Answer



The (operator-valued) matrix $\not D=\gamma\cdot D$ is anti-hermitian with respect to the inner product $$ \langle v,u\rangle:=\int_{\mathbb R^d} \bar v(x)u(x)\ \mathrm dx\tag1 $$ where $$ \bar v(x):= v^\dagger(x)\gamma^0\tag2 $$


Indeed, write $$ \not D=\not\!\partial-i\not A\tag3 $$


It is clear that the second factor satisfies \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \overline{i\not A}&=-i\overline{\not A}\\ &=-i\not A \end{aligned}\tag4 \end{equation} where we have used the fact that $\gamma^\mu$ satisfies $$ \gamma^0\gamma^{\mu\dagger}\gamma^0=\gamma^\mu\tag5 $$ and that $A^\mu$ is hermitian.


On the other hand, the first factor in $(3)$ satisfies $$ \begin{aligned} \langle v,\not\!\partial u\rangle&=\int_{\mathbb R^d} \bar v(x)\not\!\partial u(x)\ \mathrm dx\\ &=-\int_{\mathbb R^d} \bar v(x)\overset{\leftarrow}{\not\!\partial}u(x)\ \mathrm dx\\ &=-\int_{\mathbb R^d} \overline{(\bar{\not\!\partial }v)}(x)u(x)\ \mathrm dx\\ &=-\langle \not\!\partial v,u\rangle \end{aligned}\tag6 $$ where in the first equality we integrated by parts and in the last one we used $(5)$.


From this we learn that $\not D$ satisfies $\overline{\not D}=-\not D$, which is equivalent to the statement that $\not D$ is anti-hermitian with respect to $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$, as claimed.



Note that this notion of anti-hermiticity guarantees that $i\not D$ is diagonalisable, with real eigenvalues and orthogonal eigenvectors, by the usual reasons (spectral theorem, etc.): $$\tag7 i\not Dv_i=\lambda_i v_i\qquad\Rightarrow\qquad\begin{cases}\lambda_i\in\mathbb R\\\langle v_i,v_j\rangle\propto\delta_{ij}\end{cases} $$


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...