The Faraday electromagnetic tensor is anti-symmetric. What is the physical meaning of this anti-symmetry?
Answer
Abstract
In this answer we'll show that the physical meaning of the anti-symmetry of the electromagnetic tensor is the demand for the electromagnetic (Lorentz) force to be pure, where a force is called pure if it doesn't change the rest mass mo of any particle moving with any (subluminal) velocity. This demand is equivalent to the Minkowski pseudo-orthogonality of the electromagnetic force 4-vector F to any velocity 4-vector U.
The elements of the proof of this statement are interspersed in "Introduction to Special Relativity" by Wolfrang Rindler, Ed.1982.
1. The force 4-vector. Pure and Heatlike forces
In the textbook we have the relation between the force 4-vector F, the momentum 4-vector P and the velocity 4-vector U
F=dPdτ=ddτ(moU)
Then the definition of the (relativistic) three-force by
f=dpdt=d(mu)dt where p,m the relativistic momentum and mass of the particle on which f acts. Then the expression of (35.3) in the form
F=γ(u)ddt(mc,p)=γ(u)(cdmdt,f)
Now the author considers a particle with 4-velocity U=γ(u)(c,u) being subjected to a 4-force F=γ(u)(cdm/dt,f). Their inner product in Minkowski space is
\begin{equation} \mathbf{U} \boldsymbol{\cdot}\mathbf{F}=\gamma^{2}\left(u\right) \left( c^{2}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}m}{\mathrm{d}t}-\mathbf{f}\cdot \mathbf{u} \right)=c^{2}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}m_{o}}{\mathrm{d} \tau}=\gamma\left(u\right) c^{2}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}m_{o}}{\mathrm{d} t} \tag{35.7} \end{equation} where the second equation results from specializing the first to the rest frame of the particle, and the third is a consequence of (23.2) :
\begin{equation} \dfrac{ \mathrm{d} t }{ \mathrm{d} \tau}= \left( 1 - \dfrac{u^{2}}{ c^{2}} \right)^{-1/2}=\gamma\left(u\right) \tag{23.2} \end{equation}
After these the author proceeds as follows : We shall call a force pure if it does not change a particle's rest mass, and heatlike if it does not change a particle's velocity. For observe from (35.4) that a particle which is at rest but being heated (e.g.by a candle held under it) in one frame, experiences a 'force' \:\mathbf{f} = \left(\mathrm{d}m_{o}/\mathrm{d}t \right) \gamma\left(u\right)\mathbf{u} \: in every other frame.(2) The necessary and sufficient condition for a force to be pure follows at once from (35.7):
\begin{equation} \mathbf{U} \boldsymbol{\cdot}\mathbf{F}=0 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad m_{o}=\text{constant} \tag{35.9} \end{equation} while that for a force to be heatlike is \:\mathbf{A}=\boldsymbol{0}\: (by \:\mathbf{A}\: the author means the 4-acceleration vector).
2. The electromagnetic tensor and its anti-symmetry
In a next Section ( 38. The formal structure of Maxwell's theory ) the author refers that the simplest case is that of a force which everywhere depends linearly on the velocity of the particles on which it acts. In special relativity it is natural to make this requirement on the respective 4-vectors \:\mathbf{F}\: and \:\mathbf{U}\: :
\begin{equation} F_{\mu}=\dfrac{q}{c}\;E_{\mu\nu}\;U^{\nu} \tag{38.1} \end{equation} where the 'coefficients' \;E_{\mu\nu}\; in this linear relation must be tensorial to make it Lorentz-invariant if - as is natural - we take the charge \:q\: of the particle in question to be a scalar invariant.
If we next demand that the force (38.1) be pure, we need
\begin{equation} F_{\mu}U^{\mu}=(q/c)\;E_{\mu\nu}\;U^{\mu}U^{\nu}=0, \nonumber \end{equation} for all \:U^{\mu}\:, and hence
\begin{equation} E_{\mu\nu} = - E_{\nu\mu} \tag{38.2} \end{equation} i.e. the field tensor must be anti-symmetric.(1)
(1)ADDENDUM
A 3-dimensional analogue of this 4-dimensional anti-symmetry is this : Let \:\mathrm{\Omega}\: a \:3\times 3\: real matrix \begin{equation} \mathrm{\Omega}= \begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} \end{bmatrix}, \quad a_{\imath \jmath} \in \mathbb{R} \tag{A-01} \end{equation} with the following property \begin{equation} \langle\mathrm{\Omega}\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}\rangle=0, \quad \text{ for any } \mathbf{x}=\left( x_{1},x_{2},x_{3} \right) \in \mathbb{R}^{3} \tag{A-02} \end{equation} What this property does mean for \:\mathrm{\Omega}\:?
The inner product of (A-02) is explicitly \begin{align} \langle\mathrm{\Omega}\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}\rangle &=a_{11}x^{2}_{1}+a_{22}x^{2}_{2}+a_{33}x^{2}_{3} \tag{A-03}\\ & +\left( a_{12}+a_{21} \right)x_{1}x_{2}+\left( a_{23}+a_{32} \right)x_{2}x_{3}+\left( a_{31}+a_{13} \right)x_{3}x_{1}=0 \nonumber \end{align}
In order for this equality to be valid for any \:\mathbf{x}=\left( x_{1},x_{2},x_{3} \right) \in \mathbb{R}^{3}\: we must have \begin{align} a_{11}=a_{22}=a_{33} & =0 \tag{A-04a}\\ a_{21}=-a_{12} & = \omega_{3} \tag{A-04b}\\ a_{32}=-a_{23} & = \omega_{1} \tag{A-04c}\\ a_{13}=-a_{31} & = \omega_{2} \tag{A-04d} \end{align} and so \begin{equation} \mathrm{\Omega}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -\omega_{3} & \omega_{2} \\ \omega_{3} & 0 & -\omega_{1} \\ -\omega_{2} & \omega_{1} & 0 \end{bmatrix} =\boldsymbol{\omega}\boldsymbol{\times} \tag{A-05} \end{equation} that is the matrix \:\mathrm{\Omega}\: is anti-symmetric and represents the outer product \:\boldsymbol{\omega}\boldsymbol{\times}\:.
Now it's clear why (A-02) could be valid for any \:\mathbf{x}=\left( x_{1},x_{2},x_{3} \right) \in \mathbb{R}^{3}\: : the 3-vector \:\boldsymbol{\omega}\boldsymbol{\times}\mathbf{x}\: is always orthogonal to \:\mathbf{x}\:.
(2)FIGURE In the rest system \:\mathcal{S}_{o}\: of a particle, see (\alpha), heat is transfered to the particle with rate \:\dot{\mathrm{q}}_{o}\:. This rate is with respect to the proper time \:\tau\: and this heat power changes the rest mass \:m_{o}\: of the particle: \begin{equation} \dot{\mathrm{q}}_{o}=\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\left(m_{o}c^{2}\right)}{\mathrm{d}\tau}=c^{2}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}m_{o}}{\mathrm{d}\tau} \tag{B-01} \end{equation} In an other inertial system \:\mathcal{S}\: moving with constant 3-velocity \:-\mathbf{w}\: with respect to \:\mathcal{S}_{o}\:, the particle is moving with constant velocity \:\mathbf{w}\:, see (\beta), under the influence of a 'force' \begin{equation} \boldsymbol{\mathcal{h}}=\dfrac{\dot{\mathrm{q}}_{o}}{c^{2}}\mathbf{w}=\dfrac{\mathrm{d}m_{o}}{\mathrm{d}\tau}\mathbf{w}=\gamma(w)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}m_{o}}{\mathrm{d} t}\mathbf{w} \tag{B-02} \end{equation} This 'force' \:\boldsymbol{\mathcal{h}}\:, although acting on the particle, keeps its velocity \:\mathbf{w}\: constant. So, its 3-acceleration is \:\mathbf{a}=\mathrm{d}\mathbf{w}/\mathrm{d}t =\boldsymbol{0}\: and consequently its 4-acceleration \:\mathbf{A}=\boldsymbol{0}. This 'force' is defined as heatlike.
No comments:
Post a Comment