This question is sort of a continuation of this previous question of mine.
I would like to know of some further details about the Lagrangian discussed in this paper in equation 2.8 (page 7) and in Appendix A on page 31.
On page 7 the authors introduce the idea of having a pair (Q,˜Q) for the matter and that these are N=2 ``chiral multiplets" transforming in adjoint representations of the gauge group. But on page 8 they seem to refer to the same matter content as being Nf hypermultiplets.
What is the relation between these two ways of thinking about it?
I haven't seen a definition of a "chiral multiplet" and a "hypermultiplet" for 2+1 dimensions.
- If the gauge group is U(n) and we are working in a representation R of it then should I be thinking of Q and ˜Q as matrices with two indices i and a, Qia,˜Qia, such that 1≤i≤Nf and 1≤a≤dim(R)?
And their transformations are like (for a matrix U in the R representation of U(n)), Q′ia=UabQib and ˜Q′ia=U∗ab˜Qib=˜QibU†ba
Is the above right?
In appendix A (page 31) what is the explicit form of the ``fundamental representation of USp(2Nf)" that is being referred to? Is that the matrix T as used in A.3 on page 31?
In equation A.3 I guess the notation () means symmetrization as in,
smab=4πkqA(aTmqAb)=4πk(qAaTmqAb+qAbTmqAa)
I guess it is similarly so for χmab ?
In equation 4.4 (page 31) is the first factor of k4πCS(A) equal to equation 2.4 on page 5?
In the same expression for A.4, what is the meaning of the quantities
- Dab as in Tr[Dabsab]?
χab (..what is the explicit expression which is represented by Tr[χabχab] ?
χ as in Tr[χχ] and the last term iqAaχψAb ?
(..is this χ the fermionic component of the gauge superfield and different from χab?..)
This Lagrangian is notationally quite unobvious and it would be great if someone can help decipher this.
No comments:
Post a Comment