Wednesday 28 December 2016

optics - Intuition for why/how $delta int_A^B n(mathbf{r}) ds = 0$?



My textbook, Fundamentals of Photonics, 3rd edition, by Teich and Saleh, says the following:



Fermat's Principle. Optical rays travelling between two points, $A$ and $B$, follow a path such that the time of travel (or the optical pathlength) between the two points is an extremum relative to neighboring paths. This is expressed mathematically as


$$\delta \int_A^B n(\mathbf{r}) \ ds = 0, \tag{1.1-2}$$


where the symbol $\delta$, which is read "the variation of," signifies that the optical pathlength is either minimized or maximized, or is a point of inflection. ...



This probably doubles as a mathematics question, but I'm going to ask it here anyway.


How does the fact that the optical rays follow a path such that the time of travel (optical pathlength) between two points is an extremum relative to neighboring paths imply the result $\delta \int_A^B n(\mathbf{r}) \ ds = 0$? I'm struggling to develop an intuition for why/how the "variation of" optical pathlength would be $0$ in this case.


I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.



Answer




A variation is a fancy derivative. If you start with the integral $$ I=\int_A^B f(x,x')dx $$ one first makes this into a parametrized integral $$ I(\epsilon)=\int_A^B f(x(\epsilon),x'(\epsilon))dx $$ with $x(\epsilon)$ and $x'(\epsilon)$ "parametrized path" so that the true path is at $\epsilon=0$. Then $\delta I=\frac{d}{d\epsilon}I(\epsilon)=0$.


When looking for points where a function $g$ is extremal, the condition $d g/dx=0$ provides an algebraic equation to find the points $x_0$ where $g$ is extremal.


For the integral $I$, we're not looking points where the integral is extremal; instead the variation $\delta I=0$ provides a differential equation to be satisfied by the function $f(x,x')$ (here this function is the path of light) that produces an extremum of the integral.


So Fermat's principle states the path to travel from $A$ to $B$ will be such that the total time $\int_A^B dt= \int_A^B n ds$ is extremal, i.e. if you pick any neighbouring path, the time will be longer (assuming the extremum is a minimum).


This is certainly true when the index $n$ is constant: the path is then a straight line between $A$ and $B$; since the straight line is the path between two points, the time taken for light travelling at constant speed (since $n$ is constant) is minimum, i.e. $\delta I=0$.


In more general cases the index will not be constant so the more general integral $\int_A^B n(s) ds$ is the general way of obtaining the total travel time.


For an excellent discussion see: Boas, Mary L. Mathematical methods in the physical sciences. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...