Given the Lie algebra, what is the systematic way to construct the matrix representation of the generators of the desired dimension? I ask this question here because it is the physicists for whom representation of groups is more important than mathematicians.
Let us, for example, take SU(2) for concreteness. Starting from the generic parametrization of a 3×3 unitary matrix U with detU=1, and using the formula of generators Ji=−i(∂U∂θi){θi=0}
However, I'm looking for something else.
Given the Lie algebra [Ji,Jj]=iϵijkJk, is there a way that one can explicitly construct (not by guess or trial) the 3×3 representations of {Ji}?
Will the same procedure apply to solve other Lie algebras appearing in physics such as that of SO(3,1) (or SL(2,C))?
Answer
If you have the structure constants, i.e. the coefficients fcab in the commutation relations [Ta,Tb]=∑cfcabTc with a,b,c∈{1,…p} then you can construct p matrices Ma (labelled by a) of size p×p with entries (Ma)cb. These matrices will be a p×p representation of the algebra (in fact, the adjoint representation.)
This will work for every algebra. However, in the case of non-compact algebras, the resulting representation is obviously finite dimensional and thus cannot be make hermitian (i.e. it cannot exponentiate to a unitary, finite dimensional representation of the group.)
Be aware that in the case of so(3,1), there is a subtle point that comes in going from the complex back to the real form. Over C, the adjoint of so(3,1) is reducible into su(2)⊕su(2) but over the reals the adjoint is irreducible. In other words, for non-compact real forms, there are issues with reducibility and unitary.
No comments:
Post a Comment