According to classical electromagnetic theory, accelerated charges should emit radiation and lose energy. The reason given in my book why atoms don't emit radiation (say, when the atom moves along a circle) is because the atom is neutral. I can understand how this works for a neutral particle like a neutron but the atom has constituent charges within in. How can the "presence" of an opposite charge nearby stop what seems to be an intrinsic process independent of the surroundings? Do the electrons and protons emit radiation that destructively interferes or something of that sort?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
A rook stands in the lower left corner of an $m\times n$ chessboard. Alice and Bob alternately move the rook (horizontally or vertically, th...
-
Why can't we use fissions products for electricity production ? As far has I know fissions products from current nuclear power plants cr...
-
Recently I was going through "Problems in General physics" by I E Irodov. In Electromagnetics chapter, there is a question how muc...
-
Yesterday, I understood what it means to say that the moon is constantly falling (from a lecture by Richard Feynman ). In the picture below ...
-
Literature states neutral pion decay by QED cannot occur directly because the pion is uncharged. However, I cannot see why Photons are not a...
-
I am having trouble understanding how centripetal force works intuitively. This is my claim. When I have a mass strapped on a string and spi...
-
Many years ago I helped to support an experiment conducted in Japan which investigated the effects of high frequency oscillation ventilation...
No comments:
Post a Comment