Thursday, 27 April 2017

energy - What is wrong with my argument to derive the Hamiltonian in relativity?


In General Relativity (and special too) the Lagrangian for a particle of mass $m$ in the absence of forces other than gravity is


$$L=m\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}U^\mu U^\nu}$$


where $U^\mu$ is the four-velocity. In that case we can derive the momentum $p_\mu$ by


$$p_\mu=\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial U^\mu}=\dfrac{\partial}{\partial U^\mu}m\sqrt{g_{\alpha\beta}U^\alpha U^\beta}$$


$$p_\mu=\dfrac{mg_{\alpha\beta}}{2\sqrt{g_{\alpha\beta}U^\alpha U^\beta}}\left(\delta^\alpha_\mu U^\beta+\delta^\beta_\mu U^\alpha\right)=\dfrac{mg_{\mu \alpha}U^\alpha}{\sqrt{g_{\alpha\beta} U^\alpha U^\beta}}$$


If we parametrize the worldline by proper time $\tau$ then $L(\gamma(\tau),\gamma'(\tau))=m$ and we get of the square root on the denominator which is just $1$. Then


$$p_\mu= m g_{\mu\alpha}U^\alpha,$$


and these are the components of a covector. This directly leads to the momentum four-vector


$$p^\mu= m U^\mu.$$



Everything works here. Now I want to compute the energy. Well the Hamiltonian as always should be


$$H=p_\mu U^\mu-m\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}U^\mu U^\nu}=m g_{\mu\nu}U^\mu U^\nu-m\sqrt{g_{\mu \nu}U^\mu U^\nu}.$$


But if things are parametrized by propertime, when we compute $H$ on the path, that is $H(\gamma(\tau),\gamma'(\tau))$ we get zero!


What I expected was to get $H = p^0$.


What am I doing wrong here? Why am I getting zero?



Answer





  1. The problem is that the Legendre transformation from 4-velocity to 4-momentum is singular: The 4 components of the 4-momentum $p_{\mu}$ are constrained to live on the mass-shell $$p_{\mu}g^{\mu\nu}p_{\nu}~=~\pm m^2. \tag{A}$$ Here the $\pm$ refers to the choice of Minkowski sign convention $(\pm,\mp,\mp,\mp)$. Therefore it is a constrained system. The 4-momentum has only 3 independent components.





  2. How to perform the singular Legendre transformation for a relativistic point particle is explained in e.g. this Phys.SE post.




  3. It turns out that the appearance of the constraint (A) and the vanishing energy/Hamiltonian reflect the worldline reparametrization invariance of the model. See also e.g. this Phys.SE post.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...