I've been trying to derive the relation
[ˆLi,ˆLj]=iℏϵijkˆLk
without doing each permutation of x,y,z individually, but I'm not really getting anywhere. Can someone help me out please?
I've tried expanding the ˆLi=ϵnmiˆxnˆpm and using some identities for the ϵijkϵnmi which gives me the LHS as something like −ℏ2δij but I've got no further than this.
Answer
Since Li=ϵijkxjpk (operators) one has
[Li,Lj]=ϵiabϵjcd[xapb,xcpd]=ϵiabϵjcd(xa[pb,xc]pd+xc[xa,pd]pb)
This first step relies on the following property of the commutator: [AB,CD] = A[B,CD] + [A,CD]B + C[AB,D] + [AB,C]D, and then performing the expansion again. The only terms that 'survive' are those involving the canonical conjugate variables. terms like [xa,xb]=0. So,
[Li,Lj]=ϵiabϵjcd(xa[pb,xc]⏟−iℏδb,cpd+xc[xa,pd]⏟iℏδadpb)=iℏϵiabϵjcd(−xapdδbc+xcpbδad)
Because of the definition of levi-civita tensor, you can absorb a minus sign by just permuting any two neighboring indices. Furthermore, after carying out the deltas, I like to rename xcpb to xapd in the second term. This leads to
[Li,Lj]=iℏ(ϵiabϵbjd+ϵdibϵbja)xapd
Keep in mind that any index apart from i and j are summed over [Li,Lj]=iℏ(δijδad−δidδaj+δdjδia−δdaδij)xapd=iℏ(xipj−xjpi)=iℏϵijkLk
I suggest you work out the missing parts to understand how this levi-civita business works.
No comments:
Post a Comment