It is written in the Goldstein's Classical Mechanics text that $$\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dt}\left(\frac{\partial {r_i}}{\partial {q_j}}\right) = \frac{\partial {\dot r_i}}{\partial {q_j}}=\sum_k \frac{\partial^2{r_i}}{\partial {q_j}\partial{q_k}}\dot q_k+\frac{\partial^2{r_i}}{\partial {q_j}\partial t},\tag{1.50b}$$ where $$\dot r_i=\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dt}r_i=\sum_k\frac{\partial{}r_i}{\partial{q_k}}\dot q_k+\frac{\partial {r_i}}{\partial t}.\tag{1.46}$$ But it seems to me that there is another term in $\frac{\partial {\dot r_i}} {\partial {q_j}}$ because of product rule which is $$\sum_k \frac{\partial{r_i}}{\partial{q_k}}\frac{\partial{\dot q_k}}{\partial{q_j}},$$ which I think is equal to $$\frac{\partial{r_i}}{\partial{q_j}}\frac{\partial{\dot q_j}}{\partial{q_j}}$$ since $q_j$'s are independent among themselves.
Then how come $$\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dt}\left(\frac{\partial {r_i}}{\partial {q_j}}\right) = \frac{\partial {\dot r_i}}{\partial {q_j}}~?\tag{1.50b}$$ Does $$\frac{\partial{\dot q_j}}{\partial{q_j}} = 0\ ?$$
Answer
In the Lagrangian formalism position and velocity are considered as independent variables, so indeed $\frac{\partial \dot{q}_j}{\partial q_j} = 0$. See Calculus of variations -- how does it make sense to vary the position and the velocity independently?
No comments:
Post a Comment