Sunday 13 August 2017

lagrangian formalism - Why does a four-divergence not contribute in perurbation theory?


The QCD Lagrangian is $$\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{4}G^{a}_{\mu\nu}G^{a\mu\nu}+\sum\limits_{j=1}^n \left[\bar{q}_j\gamma^{\mu}iD_{\mu}q_j - (m_jq^{\dagger}_{Lj}q_{Rj}+h.c.)\right]+\frac{\theta g^2}{32\pi^2}G^{a}_{\mu\nu}\widetilde{G}^{a\mu\nu}$$ And in the book Particle Dark Matter, Sikivie states that the last term is a 4-divergence hence does not contribute in perturbation theory. Why is it a 4-divergence, and that being the case why does it not contribute in perturbation theory?



Answer




Why a divergence does not contribute to the equation of motion is trivially due to the assumption that the fields should vanish at infinity. By Stokes' theorem, any volume integral over a region $\Sigma$ of a divergence $dF$ is equal to a surface integral over its boundary $\partial \Sigma$ of the function $F$.


$$\int_\Sigma d^4x\ \partial_\mu F^\mu = \int_{\partial \Sigma} d^3\sigma_\mu\ F^\mu =0\quad \text{if }\ F^\mu\Big|_{\partial \Sigma}\equiv 0.$$


The more interesting question is why the theta term is a total divergence. Turns out that the theta term is a topological charge, and like any charge it is sourced by a topological current


$$ K^\mu = \frac1{16\pi^2} \epsilon_{\mu\alpha\beta\gamma} (A^a_\alpha\partial_\beta A^a_\gamma + \frac13 f^{abc}A^a_\alpha A^b_\beta A^c_\gamma)\,,$$


known as the Chern-Simons current.


You can verify that the divergence of this current gives the following.


$$ Q = \int d^4x\ \partial_\mu K^\mu = \frac1{32\pi^2} \int d^4x\ G^a{}_{\mu\nu}\tilde G^{a\ \mu\nu}\,,$$


where $\tilde G^{\mu\nu} = \frac12 \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}G^{\rho\sigma}$. As expected, being a total divergence, the equation of motion will be blind to this term.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...