Suppose a potential V(x), and suppose a bound particle so the allowed energy levels are discrete. Suppose a second potential ˜V(x) such that ˜V(x)≥V(x) for all x (suppose the potentials are relevant only for some interval). Does this necessarily imply that the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian with ˜V(x) will be at least those of the Hamiltonian with V(x)? That is, if En are the energy levels of the first Hamiltonian and ˜En are the energy levels of the second Hamiltonian, is En≤˜En for all n? How can one show this?
Answer
You can show this by using perturbation theory (only for suitable small changes in the potential).
When you assume, that ˜V(x)=V(x)+c with c>0, then you can write your problem als perturbation: If the unperturbated hamiltonian ˆH has eigenstates |Ψn⟩ with discrete energies, then perturbation-theory states that changing the hamiltonian by a little term ˆVperturbation will change the eigenvalues En by: ΔEn=⟨Ψn|ˆVperturbation|Ψn⟩ This is valid if you neglect terms of higher Order.
There is one think to watch out regarding perturbation theory: If your energy eigenvalues are degenerated, then the perturbation term has to be diagonal in the subspace that is spanned by the degenerated states.
In our case, ˆVperturbation=c is just a multiplication, so: ⟨Ψm|c|Ψn⟩=c⟨Ψm|Ψn⟩=c δnm ˆVperturbation is diagonal in any subspace, and we can make use of perturbation theory. You then calculate the energy-shift just by ΔEn=⟨Ψn|c|Ψn⟩=c⟨Ψn|Ψn⟩=c>0 So if you increase the potential by a constant, then the energy eigenvalues will just shift by that constant.
Edit: One can expand the proof for perturbations that vary with time: Let the change in the potential be δV(x) (which now depends on x), then you can still calculate the energy-shift by using perturbation theory. In whatever subspace that is formed by degenerate states, you can find a Basis |˜Ψn⟩ for which δV(x) is an orthogonal Operator.
In this Basis you then calculate the energy-shift like described above: ΔEn=⟨˜Ψn|δV(ˆx)|˜Ψn=∫dx|˜Ψ(x)|2δV(x)>0 Since δV(x)>0. Those are now energyshifts for eigenstates of your "old" hamiltonian. However, those eigenstates are not necessarrily the eigenstates that you started with.
No comments:
Post a Comment