Friday, 29 June 2018

quantum field theory - Electromagnetic Unruh/Hawking effect? (Improved argument)



This is an improved version of the argument in Electromagnetic Unruh effect?


In the quantum vacuum particle pairs, with total energy Ex, can come into existence provided they annihilate within a time t according to the uncertainty principle Ex t. If we let t=x/c then we have Excx where x is the Compton wavelength of the particle pair.


Let us assume that there is a force field present that immediately gives the particles an acceleration a as soon as they appear out of the vacuum.


Approximately, the extra distance, Δx, that a particle travels before it is annihilated is Δxat2ax2c2. Therefore the particle pairs have a new Compton wavelength, X, given by Xx+Δxx+ax2c2. Accordingly the energy EX of the particle pairs, after time t, is related to their new Compton wavelength X by EXcXcx(1+ax/c2)cx(1ax/c2)Exac. Thus the particle pair energy EX needed to satisfy the uncertainty principle after time t is less than the energy Ex that was borrowed from the vacuum in the first place. When the particle pair annihilates the excess energy ΔE=a/c produces a photon of electromagnetic radiation with temperature T given by TackB. Thus we have derived an Unruh radiation-like formula for a vacuum that is being accelerated by a field. If the field is the gravitational field then we have derived the Hawking temperature. By the equivalence principle this is the same as the vacuum temperature observed by an accelerating observer. But this formula should be valid for any force field.



Let us assume that the force field is a static electric field E and that the particle pair is an electron-positron pair, each with charge e and mass me. The classical equation of motion for each particle is then e E=me a. Substituting the magnitudes of the electric field and acceleration into the Unruh formula gives TckBe|E|me. If we take the electric field strength |E|=1 MV/m then the electromagnetic Unruh/Hawking temperature is T102 K. If this temperature could be measured then one could experimentally confirm the general Unruh/Hawking effect.


Is there any merit to this admittedly non-rigorous argument or can the Unruh/Hawking effect only be analyzed using quantum field theory?



Answer



You aren't really asking a question but here is my assessment of your argument.


The Unruh effect states that if one were to couple a detector to a quantum field, the detector would detect a thermal excitation as it is being accelerated. More generally, however, this excitation has to do with the thermal character of the vacuum and not necessarily the coupling of a detector. So the acceleration argument is not exactly necessary. In fact (due to an argument by Sciama), the necessary and sufficient condition is that the vacuum be stable and stationary from the perspective of a uniformly accelerated frame.


Your argument is very hand-wavy. There is a confusion of frames, there is no reference to a thermal density matrix, you have not constructed a boost Hamiltonian, you have not addressed the subtleties of the "quantum" equivalence principle, I don't know what metric you're talking about and so on.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...