When a spherical object is falling at terminal velocity through a fluid: W=U+F, where W is weight, U is upthrust and F is viscous drag. Rewriting, using Stoke's Law, we get: 43πr3ρobject.g=43πr3ρfluid.g+6πrηvt
where r is the radius of the object, ρ is density, g is the gravitational acceleration, η is the viscosity coefficient, and vt is the terminal velocity of the object.
So vt varies proportionally to r2.
However, clearly upthrust varies proportionally to r3. This implies that F varies proportionally to r so that vt can be proportional to r2. But F=6πrηvt, so as we increase r, vt increases quadratically, meaning that F must increase cubically.
This seems to be a contradiction - vt is proportional to r2 so F is proportional to r, but also F is proportional to r3.
So where is my reasoning wrong, and does F vary proportionally to r or r3?
EDIT:
I found this quote on the Wikipedia page for Stokes' law:
Note that since buoyant force increases as R3 and Stokes drag increases as R, the terminal velocity increases as R2 and thus varies greatly with particle size as shown below.
No comments:
Post a Comment