I had to do a problem, and part of it was to find the mechanical energy of satellite orbiting around mars, and I had all of the information I needed. I thought the total mechanical energy would be the kinetic energy+ the potential energy, or KE+PE. However, I had the answer sheet and it said that I had to do KE−PE, because when you integrate Gm1m2/r2 you get a negative sign. I can see why it works out mathematically, but I don't understand why you are actually losing energy when orbiting in a gravitational field.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
At room temperature, play-dough is solid(ish). But if you make a thin strip it cannot just stand up on it's own, so is it still solid? O...
-
I have an hydrogenic atom, knowing that its ground-state wavefunction has the standard form ψ=Ae−βrwith $A = \frac{\bet...
-
Sometimes I am born in silence, Other times, no. I am unseen, But I make my presence known. In time, I fade without a trace. I harm no one, ...
-
The gravitation formula says F=Gm1m2r2,so if the mass of a bob increases then the torque on it should also increase...
-
I want to know what happens to the space a black hole crosses over as our galaxy travels through space.
-
This image from NASA illustrates drag coefficients for several shapes: It is generally accepted that some variation of the teardrop/airfoil...
-
Small vessels generally lean into a turn, whereas big vessels lean out. Why do ships lean to the outside, but boats lean to the inside of a ...
No comments:
Post a Comment