I want to calculate the electromagnetic tensor components in cylindrical coordinates. Suppose I did not know that those components are given in Cartesian coordinates by (Fμν)=(0ExEyEz−Ex0Bz−By−Ey−Bz0Bx−EzBy−Bx0).
I want to derive the result in the same manner I did in the Cartesian coordinates case, i.e., using that Fμν=∂μAν−∂νAμ, where Aα=(V,→A), →B=∇×→A and →E=−∇V−∂→A/∂t. Using the formulas for curl and gradient in cylindrical coordinates, we find →E=−(∂V∂r+∂Ar∂t)ˆr −(1r∂V∂ϕ+∂Aϕ∂t)ˆϕ−(∂V∂z+∂Az∂t)ˆz and →B=(1r∂Az∂ϕ−∂Aϕ∂z)ˆr +(∂Ar∂z−∂Az∂r)ˆϕ +1r(∂(rAϕ)∂r−∂Az∂r)ˆz. The invariant interval is given by ds2=−dt2+dr2+r2dϕ2+dz2, (with c=1). Therefore, the metric tensor reads (gμν)=(−1000010000r200001), and its inverse is (gμν)=(−10000100001/r200001).
Which implies ∂0=−∂0, ∂1=∂1, ∂2=1r2∂2 and ∂3=∂3.
So, for example, F01=∂0A1−∂1A0=−∂0A1−∂1A0=−∂Ar∂t−∂V∂r=Er, which is reassuring. Now, F02=∂0A2−∂2A0=−∂0A2−1r2∂2A0=−∂Aϕ∂t−1r2∂V∂ϕ. However, I cannot identify this quantity with any component of the electric field. This last expression looks almost like Eϕ, except for an extra 1r multiplying ∂V/∂ϕ. What went wrong here?
Answer
The problem is that there is a mismatch between the vector basis that you are using to write the 4-vector potential and the ones you are considering for your metric, which are not unitary. The standard cylindrical coordinate basis should have a Minkwoski metric, since we don't really have curvature in this case. The only difference is then a 1/r factor in the ϕ component.
Therefore, in order to be consistent, you need to replace A2→Aϕr. Then, you will see that F02=Eϕr, which, again, is consistent with your metric.
No comments:
Post a Comment