Wednesday, 20 February 2019

electromagnetism - Electromagnetic tensor in cylindrical coordinates from scratch


I want to calculate the electromagnetic tensor components in cylindrical coordinates. Suppose I did not know that those components are given in Cartesian coordinates by (Fμν)=(0ExEyEzEx0BzByEyBz0BxEzByBx0).


I want to derive the result in the same manner I did in the Cartesian coordinates case, i.e., using that Fμν=μAννAμ, where Aα=(V,A), B=×A and E=VA/t. Using the formulas for curl and gradient in cylindrical coordinates, we find E=(Vr+Art)ˆr (1rVϕ+Aϕt)ˆϕ(Vz+Azt)ˆz

and B=(1rAzϕAϕz)ˆr +(ArzAzr)ˆϕ +1r((rAϕ)rAzr)ˆz. 
The invariant interval is given by ds2=dt2+dr2+r2dϕ2+dz2, (with c=1). Therefore, the metric tensor reads (gμν)=(1000010000r200001),
and its inverse is (gμν)=(10000100001/r200001).


Which implies 0=0, 1=1, 2=1r22 and 3=3.


So, for example, F01=0A11A0=0A11A0=ArtVr=Er,

which is reassuring. Now, F02=0A22A0=0A21r22A0=Aϕt1r2Vϕ.
However, I cannot identify this quantity with any component of the electric field. This last expression looks almost like Eϕ, except for an extra 1r multiplying V/ϕ. What went wrong here?



Answer



The problem is that there is a mismatch between the vector basis that you are using to write the 4-vector potential and the ones you are considering for your metric, which are not unitary. The standard cylindrical coordinate basis should have a Minkwoski metric, since we don't really have curvature in this case. The only difference is then a 1/r factor in the ϕ component.


Therefore, in order to be consistent, you need to replace A2Aϕr. Then, you will see that F02=Eϕr, which, again, is consistent with your metric.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...