I have just read this question: What justifies dimensional analysis. One statement was:
Maybe the speed of a comet is given by its period multiplied by its mass. Why not?
As a formula this is v=mT. How do we know that this is wrong? I am not asking for the standard answer concerning the incompatibility of the dimensions. Suppose v∝m and v∝T, then one could argue that v∝mT and so v=CmT where C is a constant that fixes the dimensions.
I will give another example: FG=Gm1m2/r2 - Newton's law of gravity. As far as I know, Newton knew the following: F∝m1m2/r2 and he didn't know the value of G so he simply stated F=Gm1m2/r2 with G fixing the dimensions.
Now comes my real question: My intuition tells me that v∝mT is not right but can you exclude it with dimensional analysis? Then you would also have to deny Newton's law of gravity. How do you know that v=CmT is incorrect but F=Gm1m2/r2 is not? Especially: When can you "invent" a constant in dimensional analysis which fixes the dimensions? If you could do it all the time, dimensional analysis would not be helpful...
No comments:
Post a Comment