Monday, 18 February 2019

newtonian gravity - Dimensional analysis - When can you introduce constants that make dimensions compatible?


I have just read this question: What justifies dimensional analysis. One statement was:



Maybe the speed of a comet is given by its period multiplied by its mass. Why not?



As a formula this is v=mT. How do we know that this is wrong? I am not asking for the standard answer concerning the incompatibility of the dimensions. Suppose vm and vT, then one could argue that vmT and so v=CmT where C is a constant that fixes the dimensions.


I will give another example: FG=Gm1m2/r2 - Newton's law of gravity. As far as I know, Newton knew the following: Fm1m2/r2 and he didn't know the value of G so he simply stated F=Gm1m2/r2 with G fixing the dimensions.


Now comes my real question: My intuition tells me that vmT is not right but can you exclude it with dimensional analysis? Then you would also have to deny Newton's law of gravity. How do you know that v=CmT is incorrect but F=Gm1m2/r2 is not? Especially: When can you "invent" a constant in dimensional analysis which fixes the dimensions? If you could do it all the time, dimensional analysis would not be helpful...




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...